Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: What does it really MEAN when people label themselves as political "moderates"? [View all]2banon
(7,321 posts)202. Well Stated!
and to further complicate things as regards mis-representation and shaping public perceptions, we have the element of manufactured consent to manufactured reactions of manufactured crises, courtesy of a Media Apparatus that is owned by Corporate Titans with sometimes competing agendas, often shared agendas, and oh yes infiltrated by the National Security State to boot..
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
213 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
What does it really MEAN when people label themselves as political "moderates"? [View all]
Ken Burch
Nov 2013
OP
Not sure it's valid to assume those who don't label themselves "ideologue" or "Ideologist"
Ken Burch
Nov 2013
#187
But then you don't answer the OP's question either. What do you mean when you say you
Bluenorthwest
Nov 2013
#9
Mostly the views of the socially conservative Moral Majority types are "overly far right".
Throd
Nov 2013
#19
Please list a few "far left" and "far right" views you don't subscribe to. nt.
Warren Stupidity
Nov 2013
#183
A number of people in this thread have equated radicalism with violence and repression.
Ken Burch
Nov 2013
#208
My point is that we do in fact have a major political party advocating far right positions.
Warren Stupidity
Nov 2013
#209
Splitting the difference nearly always is nosensical with republicans because their goal posts
GoneFishin
Nov 2013
#155
Um no. It is not a logical conclusion that radical ideas result in the killing
Luminous Animal
Nov 2013
#28
way to to. obviously was referring to the EXTREME ones who used violence
Pretzel_Warrior
Nov 2013
#203
I don't think it is moderate to say 'we know what is right, but let's wait'
Bluenorthwest
Nov 2013
#32
Of course the gradualists here refuse to address what Martin said and instead they make
Bluenorthwest
Nov 2013
#157
MLK was classified as a Terrorist courtesy J.E.Hoover and the National Security Establishment
2banon
Nov 2013
#201
If they want money or your vote, it means that they consider everyone else to be an extremist
AnotherMcIntosh
Nov 2013
#10
Good discussion. The official framing of left, right, & center are phony, & function as a tool to...
Faryn Balyncd
Nov 2013
#20
Correct. The assumption that political views can be accurately represented linearly, and that views
Faryn Balyncd
Nov 2013
#91
I don't think there's any merit in creating a new consensus anywhere between the poles.
lumberjack_jeff
Nov 2013
#177
Or it depends on the issue, and the strength of their feelings on the matter
IronLionZion
Nov 2013
#25
in the sane and rational universe - a moderate or a centrist would be someone who neither embraces
Douglas Carpenter
Nov 2013
#27
You have described well what it should mean, at least in the context of right/left pol. ideology
Dragonfli
Nov 2013
#65
This is the first time I've heard France described as moderate in the context of US politics
lumberjack_jeff
Nov 2013
#160
I'd also give european moderates something of a break. They can look around...
lumberjack_jeff
Nov 2013
#178
"You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life."
lumberjack_jeff
Nov 2013
#114
Hey I'll take an a$$ who will fight corporations over a nice guy who won't any day.
liberal_at_heart
Nov 2013
#127
What does it MEAN? It means they are worried only about what is good for them WHILE
Drew Richards
Nov 2013
#53
Help me out here, what exactly is not moderate about today's Democratic Party?
Snake Plissken
Nov 2013
#55
those are the millions of self proclaimed libertarians who post on internet message boards
Snake Plissken
Nov 2013
#60
I assume it is code for "My life is working well, don't change it." nt.
Starry Messenger
Nov 2013
#61
"There's Nothing in the Middle of the Road but Yellow Stripes and Dead Armadillos"
YOHABLO
Nov 2013
#63
You said it so well. I always considered myself to be moderate before I started reading
JDPriestly
Nov 2013
#66
This thread is very enlightening about libreral falsely placed arrogance
Pretzel_Warrior
Nov 2013
#69
exactly! the gradual dismantling of the New Deal/Great Society social contract and finding
Douglas Carpenter
Nov 2013
#109
if it wasn't for those progressive purist and other crazy liberals we could have made lot of
Douglas Carpenter
Nov 2013
#123
hardly - I certainly didn't support them - Although, I suppose in the paradigm of the time
Douglas Carpenter
Nov 2013
#137
Your post could be word for word written by any extremist which is a textbook definition
Number23
Nov 2013
#194
I understand that I won't get 100% my way, but that doesn't mean I should aim for 50%. n/t
lumberjack_jeff
Nov 2013
#90
If you want taxes on the rich raised to 90%, you're far to the left on this issue.
Nye Bevan
Nov 2013
#80
we have been going the way of the moderate for 30 years. It is not working.
liberal_at_heart
Nov 2013
#105
it's means they're too stupid to care (or chicken) to to be honest about their opinions
gopiscrap
Nov 2013
#82
Yes it is, but you don't have to participate in it. You can vote for any number of candidates from
liberal_at_heart
Nov 2013
#124
That's fine with those of us who chose that route. I have such a bitter taste in my mouth. I can
liberal_at_heart
Nov 2013
#135
I vote for democrats when there is a populist liberal democrat to vote for.
liberal_at_heart
Nov 2013
#141
in the current paradigm it means someone who is somewhat socially liberal - but supports only
Douglas Carpenter
Nov 2013
#117
if you watch the Sunday morning talking heads - the extreme left are those who oppose
Douglas Carpenter
Nov 2013
#130
Exactly-- "moderate" does describe an actual set of concrete positions in today's
Marr
Nov 2013
#172
I used to be that kind of liberal before Race to the Top, Common Core Curriculum. Before they
liberal_at_heart
Nov 2013
#142
When I call myself that, I mean that rapid systemic changes cause more harm than good
Recursion
Nov 2013
#146
It means they want rich people to get richer off the backs of not rich people. It also means
valerief
Nov 2013
#151
I like your TV theory. It meshes well will the low information voter post toward the top
GoneFishin
Nov 2013
#153
Lies are low information. Truth is high information. Teevee spews lies and nurtures
valerief
Nov 2013
#154
It means "those who desiire to make the Democratic Party more right wing in order
Zorra
Nov 2013
#166
If you agreed with Obama on some issues and Romney on some issues, you're a moderate
Hippo_Tron
Nov 2013
#173
Moderation in temper is always a virtue; but moderation in principle is always a vice. Thomas Paine
Tierra_y_Libertad
Nov 2013
#175
Most of the people I know who call themselves moderates say they agree with both D and R....
phleshdef
Nov 2013
#204
I am a Moderate. But there is no policy that I vote with conservatives on.
bluestate10
Nov 2013
#212
I don't think you can have this conversation until "Centrists" are separated from moderate.
TheKentuckian
Nov 2013
#213