Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Experts Say Nuclear Power May Be Our Only Hope [View all]
PITTSBURGH (AP) Some of the world's top climate scientists say wind and solar energy won't be enough to head off extreme global warming, and they're asking environmentalists to support the development of safer nuclear power as one way to cut fossil fuel pollution.
Four scientists who have played a key role in alerting the public to the dangers of climate change sent letters Sunday to leading environmental groups and politicians around the world. The letter, an advance copy of which was given to The Associated Press, urges a crucial discussion on the role of nuclear power in fighting climate change.
Environmentalists agree that global warming is a threat to ecosystems and humans, but many oppose nuclear power and believe that new forms of renewable energy will be able to power the world within the next few decades.
That isn't realistic, the letter said.
"Those energy sources cannot scale up fast enough" to deliver the amount of cheap and reliable power the world needs, and "with the planet warming and carbon dioxide emissions rising faster than ever, we cannot afford to turn away from any technology" that has the potential to reduce greenhouse gases.
The letter signers are James Hansen, a former top NASA scientist; Ken Caldeira, of the Carnegie Institution; Kerry Emanuel, of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology; and Tom Wigley, of the University of Adelaide in Australia.
Four scientists who have played a key role in alerting the public to the dangers of climate change sent letters Sunday to leading environmental groups and politicians around the world. The letter, an advance copy of which was given to The Associated Press, urges a crucial discussion on the role of nuclear power in fighting climate change.
Environmentalists agree that global warming is a threat to ecosystems and humans, but many oppose nuclear power and believe that new forms of renewable energy will be able to power the world within the next few decades.
That isn't realistic, the letter said.
"Those energy sources cannot scale up fast enough" to deliver the amount of cheap and reliable power the world needs, and "with the planet warming and carbon dioxide emissions rising faster than ever, we cannot afford to turn away from any technology" that has the potential to reduce greenhouse gases.
The letter signers are James Hansen, a former top NASA scientist; Ken Caldeira, of the Carnegie Institution; Kerry Emanuel, of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology; and Tom Wigley, of the University of Adelaide in Australia.
Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/experts-say-nuclear-power-may-be-our-only-hope-2013-11
42 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
international Thorium Energy Conference, ThEC13, at CERN, in Geneva Switzerland, October 27 to 31
FarCenter
Nov 2013
#2
I don't think that they are proposing obsolete and dangerous American designs.
FarCenter
Nov 2013
#4
Nuke power can be designed to be safe, don't use materials that can be weapons grade or close
uponit7771
Nov 2013
#7
Nuclear will always involve creating a mess mining for it, processing it, using it for fuel. Plus-
KittyWampus
Nov 2013
#12
Old nuke energy I agree, new nuke energy I disagree... Cars designed 40 years ago are less safe
uponit7771
Nov 2013
#13
Radiation during the generation of course is dangers but can be contained now vs before
uponit7771
Nov 2013
#19
The scientists in the OP opine that the risks of nuclear are less than climate change without it
FarCenter
Nov 2013
#24
Even if the 3 billion in developed nations back off, there are another 4 to 6 billion using more
FarCenter
Nov 2013
#21
Then we need to rethink how much power we need and change our lifestyles BECAUSE:
Tikki
Nov 2013
#25
if one wants to sustain current levels of electrical usage - solar and wind would not be enough
Douglas Carpenter
Nov 2013
#28
Fuck that. We could scale up in 2 years if it weren't for capitalists/capitalism preventing it
Zorra
Nov 2013
#36