Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

FarCenter

(19,429 posts)
Sun Nov 3, 2013, 09:34 AM Nov 2013

Experts Say Nuclear Power May Be Our Only Hope [View all]

PITTSBURGH (AP) — Some of the world's top climate scientists say wind and solar energy won't be enough to head off extreme global warming, and they're asking environmentalists to support the development of safer nuclear power as one way to cut fossil fuel pollution.

Four scientists who have played a key role in alerting the public to the dangers of climate change sent letters Sunday to leading environmental groups and politicians around the world. The letter, an advance copy of which was given to The Associated Press, urges a crucial discussion on the role of nuclear power in fighting climate change.

Environmentalists agree that global warming is a threat to ecosystems and humans, but many oppose nuclear power and believe that new forms of renewable energy will be able to power the world within the next few decades.

That isn't realistic, the letter said.

"Those energy sources cannot scale up fast enough" to deliver the amount of cheap and reliable power the world needs, and "with the planet warming and carbon dioxide emissions rising faster than ever, we cannot afford to turn away from any technology" that has the potential to reduce greenhouse gases.

The letter signers are James Hansen, a former top NASA scientist; Ken Caldeira, of the Carnegie Institution; Kerry Emanuel, of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology; and Tom Wigley, of the University of Adelaide in Australia.


Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/experts-say-nuclear-power-may-be-our-only-hope-2013-11
42 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Something like a LFTR design? dairydog91 Nov 2013 #1
international Thorium Energy Conference, ThEC13, at CERN, in Geneva Switzerland, October 27 to 31 FarCenter Nov 2013 #2
A fukushima in every garage! Warren Stupidity Nov 2013 #3
I don't think that they are proposing obsolete and dangerous American designs. FarCenter Nov 2013 #4
Proliferation of nuclear power generation on the scale required Warren Stupidity Nov 2013 #6
Not using modern designs it won't. gcomeau Nov 2013 #9
The old designs were "safe" when they were deployed too. Warren Stupidity Nov 2013 #16
"...safer nuclear power..." 99Forever Nov 2013 #5
Nuke power can be designed to be safe, don't use materials that can be weapons grade or close uponit7771 Nov 2013 #7
Nuclear will always involve creating a mess mining for it, processing it, using it for fuel. Plus- KittyWampus Nov 2013 #12
The older way of processing materials for nukes will. Thorium is abundant uponit7771 Nov 2013 #15
Unless Thorium falls from the sky everywhere, it's a waste and messy. KittyWampus Nov 2013 #38
Nuclear Power Generation Is Not Safe. It Cannot Be Made to Be Safe. MineralMan Nov 2013 #8
You are incorrect. gcomeau Nov 2013 #10
We disagree, it seems. MineralMan Nov 2013 #11
Old nuke energy I agree, new nuke energy I disagree... Cars designed 40 years ago are less safe uponit7771 Nov 2013 #13
I disagree. One problem lies in the commercial nature of MineralMan Nov 2013 #14
Radiation during the generation of course is dangers but can be contained now vs before uponit7771 Nov 2013 #19
Any and all systems, both human and nature made, will fail eventually seveneyes Nov 2013 #20
That is true enough. Solar, hydro, and wind power MineralMan Nov 2013 #23
All courses of action to continue human civilization carry risk. FarCenter Nov 2013 #17
Indeed. Where we can see and measure the risks in advance, however, MineralMan Nov 2013 #22
The scientists in the OP opine that the risks of nuclear are less than climate change without it FarCenter Nov 2013 #24
Nuclear power kicks ass, we need more, and about 100 billion a year snooper2 Nov 2013 #29
Yah, OK, then. MineralMan Nov 2013 #32
Never a single blip in any of these articles IDemo Nov 2013 #18
Even if the 3 billion in developed nations back off, there are another 4 to 6 billion using more FarCenter Nov 2013 #21
I wasn't speaking of petroleum resources, at least not exclusively IDemo Nov 2013 #27
Add to that the minerals and material that would go into alternative energy FarCenter Nov 2013 #40
Then we need to rethink how much power we need and change our lifestyles BECAUSE: Tikki Nov 2013 #25
I tend to agree. k&r n/t Laelth Nov 2013 #26
if one wants to sustain current levels of electrical usage - solar and wind would not be enough Douglas Carpenter Nov 2013 #28
Or "electrical" usage? IDemo Nov 2013 #30
that was the spell checker fucking with me Douglas Carpenter Nov 2013 #31
If the human race really put a Manhattan Project scale effort into renewables daleo Nov 2013 #33
Up fast enough? RobertEarl Nov 2013 #34
Then we are truly fucked. nt mother earth Nov 2013 #35
Fuck that. We could scale up in 2 years if it weren't for capitalists/capitalism preventing it Zorra Nov 2013 #36
Nuclear power IS our only hope if we want civilization to continue as it now exists... hunter Nov 2013 #37
We just have to change our mode of thinking RobertEarl Nov 2013 #41
How much electricity would we generate... roamer65 Nov 2013 #39
Fukushima laughs at this. WinkyDink Nov 2013 #42
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Experts Say Nuclear Power...