Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Experts Say Nuclear Power May Be Our Only Hope [View all]MineralMan
(150,999 posts)32. Yah, OK, then.
That's what they were saying about fission power in the 1950s and 60s, too. Power so cheap there wouldn't be any reason for an electric bill. That's what they said.
I grew up just a few air miles from the first commercial nuclear power generation reactor. While I was still in high school, it failed and had a partial meltdown. Look it up. Google Santa Susana meltdown. That was 1959. We still built nuclear power plants. Now, we have Fukushima.
The future always looks bright, technologically, to those who are involved in the technology. The reality often doesn't end up being quite so bright, though.
Good luck with that fusion stuff. I'm 68 years old. I'll be dead before it goes online.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
42 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
international Thorium Energy Conference, ThEC13, at CERN, in Geneva Switzerland, October 27 to 31
FarCenter
Nov 2013
#2
I don't think that they are proposing obsolete and dangerous American designs.
FarCenter
Nov 2013
#4
Nuke power can be designed to be safe, don't use materials that can be weapons grade or close
uponit7771
Nov 2013
#7
Nuclear will always involve creating a mess mining for it, processing it, using it for fuel. Plus-
KittyWampus
Nov 2013
#12
Old nuke energy I agree, new nuke energy I disagree... Cars designed 40 years ago are less safe
uponit7771
Nov 2013
#13
Radiation during the generation of course is dangers but can be contained now vs before
uponit7771
Nov 2013
#19
The scientists in the OP opine that the risks of nuclear are less than climate change without it
FarCenter
Nov 2013
#24
Even if the 3 billion in developed nations back off, there are another 4 to 6 billion using more
FarCenter
Nov 2013
#21
Then we need to rethink how much power we need and change our lifestyles BECAUSE:
Tikki
Nov 2013
#25
if one wants to sustain current levels of electrical usage - solar and wind would not be enough
Douglas Carpenter
Nov 2013
#28
Fuck that. We could scale up in 2 years if it weren't for capitalists/capitalism preventing it
Zorra
Nov 2013
#36