Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Bipartisan House Gives In To Wall Street, Passes Dodd-Frank Rollback Drafted By Citigroup Lobbyists [View all]Jim Lane
(11,175 posts)27. "Bipartisan" = not a straight party-line vote, but having significant support from each party
At least, that's how I'd define it. Regrettably, this vote qualifies as bipartisan. I'm particularly disappointed to see that my former Representative, Carolyn Maloney, voted for it. She's usually a reliable progressive vote. Her district, on the East Side of Manhattan, is home to quite a few 1%ers and financial-industry people, and I assume that Citibank and its ilk went all-out in mobilizing constituent pressure on her.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
54 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Bipartisan House Gives In To Wall Street, Passes Dodd-Frank Rollback Drafted By Citigroup Lobbyists [View all]
Purveyor
Nov 2013
OP
"Bipartisan House"? - 99% of repubs voted for it; 2/3 of Democrats voted against.
pampango
Nov 2013
#17
"Bipartisan" = not a straight party-line vote, but having significant support from each party
Jim Lane
Nov 2013
#27
To me it means a majority of both parties. In this case, Democrats voted to defeat the bill although
pampango
Nov 2013
#36
When Hoyer, Clyburn, and DWS vote YES and Pelosi and Israel do not vote at all, this poses questions
Mass
Nov 2013
#32
In this case Wall Street did not "need" any Democratic votes. 222 repubs were more than enough.
pampango
Nov 2013
#40
As many "Dems" as are needed to ensure the desired corporate outcome
woo me with science
Nov 2013
#49
The Oligarchs, Billionaires And Millionaires Own And Control The Politicians That Own And Control Us
cantbeserious
Nov 2013
#13
Anyone know if this will pass the Senate - and if it does, will they have a veto proof majority?
Drunken Irishman
Nov 2013
#16
Thanks to the best efforts of corporate lobbyists working on the behalf of shareholders everywhere.
raouldukelives
Nov 2013
#37