Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: If you make $50,000 per year .... [View all]dawg
(10,777 posts)86. I read it. It's dodgy.
Relies on Cato Institute figures for one component. Relies on fishy interest-rate assumptions for much of the "banking" subsidies. Counts billions in corporate profits as "subsidies". Yes, corporations do rip us off. But the profits they make from selling me overvalued crap should not be counted as corporate subsidies from the government.
Like I said earlier, I agree with the sentiment here. But these claims are overreaching, and IMHO the real numbers are damning enough without having to resort to this sort of hype.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
127 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
You pay the corporation $4,000 a year, while the corporation pays $0 in Taxes.
fasttense
Nov 2013
#6
Class solidarity. $50K in a small town in Mississippi still makes you a big local fish
Recursion
Nov 2013
#27
I have spoken with individuals who fit this profile and I can tell that is what they believe,
GoneFishin
Nov 2013
#92
More on food stamps than welfare? Wouldn't have thought that. interesting. nt
Laura PourMeADrink
Nov 2013
#8
Think it's one of those things that both sides can make the numbers look
Laura PourMeADrink
Nov 2013
#15
don't think this is meant to be an all-inclusive list - just selected items. nt
Laura PourMeADrink
Nov 2013
#17
Social Security is not part of the national budget; it is a separate insurance trust fund that
DhhD
Nov 2013
#55
The standard deduction and the head of household deduction must be considered too.
DhhD
Nov 2013
#60
I suspect that by "corporate subsidies" people don't mean direct payments to corporations
magical thyme
Nov 2013
#33
I realize that. I just couldn't think of the federal subsidies off the top of my head. Eg, big oil
magical thyme
Nov 2013
#125
as much as I know that people are not properly focused on the huge amounts
Laura PourMeADrink
Nov 2013
#43
These numbers are bad - I ran the calculations yesterday when I saw it pop up all over Facebook
NewJeffCT
Nov 2013
#42
Thank you. This graphic is a real mess -- makes us all look as batty as Glenn Beck
BlueStreak
Nov 2013
#69
The pittance paid for foreign aid needs to be on that list too, since it is a frequent target.
Bernardo de La Paz
Nov 2013
#71
$4000.00? That's amazing that the "corporate subsidies" came out to such a nice round number.
Nye Bevan
Nov 2013
#85
Damn. Now THAT'S spelling it out like we need to...K & R & spread this far and wide. nt
mother earth
Nov 2013
#103