Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Not really. Demobrat Nov 2013 #1
This. redqueen Nov 2013 #5
Hell yes. Daemonaquila Nov 2013 #105
I don't agree. phylny Nov 2013 #109
+1 leftstreet Nov 2013 #12
+1000 ismnotwasm Nov 2013 #20
Agreed. It's why I voted "no" in the poll n/t livetohike Nov 2013 #43
The "rare" part comes about via universal access to free contraception. kestrel91316 Nov 2013 #46
that's pipi_k Nov 2013 #63
+1 sakabatou Nov 2013 #90
This. ^^^ CrispyQ Nov 2013 #61
that and "none of my damn business". Warren Stupidity Nov 2013 #71
+1. That's why I voted no. nt NCTraveler Nov 2013 #76
That should be Option #1. Zorra Nov 2013 #94
Safe, Legal, and None of Anyone's Business get the red out Nov 2013 #2
+1 grahamhgreen Nov 2013 #19
+infinity etherealtruth Nov 2013 #25
+ 1 Myrina Nov 2013 #28
Yes. n/t me b zola Nov 2013 #35
+1 n/t Gormy Cuss Nov 2013 #38
This. NuclearDem Nov 2013 #42
+1 n/t tammywammy Nov 2013 #54
+++++++ uppityperson Nov 2013 #56
Yup. n/t GoCubsGo Nov 2013 #66
Absolutely! silverweb Nov 2013 #79
And acess to free birth control idwiyo Nov 2013 #86
This is my answer bigwillq Nov 2013 #99
+1. The word "rare" does not belong there. It is judgmental. n/t MadrasT Nov 2013 #118
No. It should be safe, legal, hygienic, affordalbe and available as needed. So should... uppityperson Nov 2013 #3
I think this is the best answer. n/t RKP5637 Nov 2013 #62
Safe, legal and readily available at all times and places. Arugula Latte Nov 2013 #4
It should be safe, legal, and available as much as it's needed gollygee Nov 2013 #6
I think so, especially to birth control and real sex ed. I find it hard to believe any RKP5637 Nov 2013 #69
Safe and legal, yes, but rare, no. I want every woman who does not want Nay Nov 2013 #7
Pretty much, yes. Lizzie Poppet Nov 2013 #8
I couldn't have said it better myself. HappyMe Nov 2013 #15
Me neither War Horse Nov 2013 #36
I will put a check mark next to this response. ScreamingMeemie Nov 2013 #16
Sums up my feelings as well maddezmom Nov 2013 #23
That's exactly how I feel. You summed it up for me perfectly! eom BlueCaliDem Nov 2013 #32
Check for this box. JoePhilly Nov 2013 #40
Thank you. Amazing how some here don't understand the meaning of rare in this context. n/t Dawgs Nov 2013 #50
We understand perfectly well Demobrat Nov 2013 #108
No, not mmmkay. n/t Dawgs Nov 2013 #112
Which part do you have a problem with, Demobrat Nov 2013 #114
"Abortion is usually a very traumatic experience for a woman". Some, yes, but not "usually" uppityperson Nov 2013 #59
We have had different experiences, then. Lizzie Poppet Nov 2013 #64
I am wondering what your experience is? uppityperson Nov 2013 #68
Perhaps my use of "very" was overstating. Lizzie Poppet Nov 2013 #72
Thanks. Talking about all this is necessary and I thank you for doing so in a civil manner. uppityperson Nov 2013 #73
Likewise! Lizzie Poppet Nov 2013 #82
I have had my teeth deep cleaned, filed down, pulled out, RebelOne Nov 2013 #83
Yes. Rare, to me, means lots and lots of education and open dialog on birth control. onehandle Nov 2013 #9
AARRGH! Who was the idio...person who came up with 'rare' ? leftstreet Nov 2013 #10
Someone who thought our human rights were something to be compromised redqueen Nov 2013 #17
No kidding leftstreet Nov 2013 #22
That analogy doesn't work because the rationalization they use is that abortion is a bad, horrible, redqueen Nov 2013 #31
True enough leftstreet Nov 2013 #34
Agree. Arugula Latte Nov 2013 #49
Was it Clinton? nt NCTraveler Nov 2013 #78
Only if gay marriage was an invasive medical procedure that was Crunchy Frog Nov 2013 #113
So Ted Kennedy "tried to ingratiate himself with the religious right"? Nye Bevan Nov 2013 #26
He was a practicing Catholic. redqueen Nov 2013 #39
Ted Kennedy embraced it, but I'm not sure if he came up with it: Nye Bevan Nov 2013 #24
Bill Clinton Demobrat Nov 2013 #48
Ted Kennedy was way ahead of Bill Clinton on "rare". See post above (nt) Nye Bevan Nov 2013 #52
This is what I remember Demobrat Nov 2013 #57
He is welcome to have as few as he wants. idwiyo Nov 2013 #84
Is he welcome to encourage sex education and accessible contraception? (nt) Nye Bevan Nov 2013 #92
He is welcome to support Her's and Her's alone Right to Choose why, when and how many. idwiyo Nov 2013 #96
Rare means something different than what you're thinking. n/t Dawgs Nov 2013 #53
Infrequent, uncommon leftstreet Nov 2013 #74
Exactly. n/t Dawgs Nov 2013 #104
I had to vote yes in spite of that word's presence. I don't think 'rare' is relevant. ancianita Nov 2013 #91
No. That's just bullshit rhetoric. cali Nov 2013 #11
Safe, legal and available are more important than frequency. pampango Nov 2013 #13
It seems to me that there is ohheckyeah Nov 2013 #14
This message was self-deleted by its author LiberalLoner Nov 2013 #18
The catholic church would hand out condoms like candies Nye Bevan Nov 2013 #27
What post #1 said. Vashta Nerada Nov 2013 #21
its safe and legal, whether it's rare is a woman's choice.... spanone Nov 2013 #29
I like "rare" because it implies access to birth control and appropriate education. IdaBriggs Nov 2013 #30
the 'rare' part is unnecessary rightwing pandering. geek tragedy Nov 2013 #33
Safe, legal and rare as a result of education and ample access to birth control. Brickbat Nov 2013 #37
Safe, legal Aerows Nov 2013 #41
For me, this is the ideal. ZombieHorde Nov 2013 #44
That assumes legal and affordable birth control that all women have access to Warpy Nov 2013 #45
Safe, legal and rare and available. Autumn Nov 2013 #47
AAAAAAAAAAACK. NO . no no. no PeaceNikki Nov 2013 #51
To me, "rare" means preferring sex education and condom use over abortion. Nye Bevan Nov 2013 #58
No. "Rare" is an adjective that describes how often something happens. It's subjective. And bullshit PeaceNikki Nov 2013 #70
+1 idwiyo Nov 2013 #81
Without "rare" Democrats will continue to lose elections and also the right to choose. Dawgs Nov 2013 #55
I certainly don't feel people should be forced into abortion for financial reasons Yo_Mama Nov 2013 #60
If everyone had access to contraception and education, the need for abortion would be cut by 3/4. appleannie1 Nov 2013 #65
About 2/3 right. Iggo Nov 2013 #67
I voted NO, because I believe that the choice for abortion MineralMan Nov 2013 #75
I voted no gopiscrap Nov 2013 #77
I vote NO. HER body, HER choice. Everyone else should just mind their own business, period. idwiyo Nov 2013 #80
What I wish more... is that the people who posted polls actually voted in them. ScreamingMeemie Nov 2013 #85
I don't usually vote right away when I post a poll Nye Bevan Nov 2013 #100
Thank you Nye ScreamingMeemie Nov 2013 #106
"rare" is too open to interpretation One_Life_To_Give Nov 2013 #87
I think abortion should be available on demand, but I selected "rare" BeeBee Nov 2013 #88
+1 nt Nye Bevan Nov 2013 #93
HOGWASH!! Reduced? To what? Numbers mean nothing without context. PeaceNikki Nov 2013 #95
No, the only hogwash here is your response to my post. BeeBee Nov 2013 #102
Rare or not, it is not my call. Rex Nov 2013 #89
I think abortion should be safe and legal. BlueCheese Nov 2013 #97
The only two requirements should be safe and legal HarveyDarkey Nov 2013 #98
Abortion is not a "problem" Jeff In Milwaukee Nov 2013 #101
Yes, because it is technically surgery fried eggs Nov 2013 #103
So "safe, legal and rare" carries the day overwhelmingly on DU. Nye Bevan Nov 2013 #107
I firmly feel that the woman's right to autonomy trumps all LostOne4Ever Nov 2013 #110
My approach to the issue is that I have one head attached to one neck Warren DeMontague Nov 2013 #111
You have no interest in encouraging improved access to contraception? Nye Bevan Nov 2013 #115
You can't encourage access. You can broaden access. Warren DeMontague Nov 2013 #116
No, safe, legal, on demand and none of my business The Second Stone Nov 2013 #117
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Does "abortion shoul...»Reply #41