Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

In reply to the discussion: Message auto-removed [View all]

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
4. I believe so.
Mon Nov 4, 2013, 04:32 PM
Nov 2013

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Message auto-removed [View all] Name removed Nov 2013 OP
Roe V. Wade established a Trimester system which was subsequently modified in the Casey decision. Warren DeMontague Nov 2013 #1
Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2013 #2
I believe so. Warren DeMontague Nov 2013 #4
No idea quinnox Nov 2013 #3
Viability is still 24 weeks. Fetal development does not change with the times. Barack_America Nov 2013 #5
Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2013 #8
No it doesn't. idwiyo Nov 2013 #9
Viability is defined at greater than 50% survival with maximum intervention. Barack_America Nov 2013 #13
Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2013 #16
Nope. Daemonaquila Nov 2013 #27
Nope. Daemonaquila Nov 2013 #20
No, it doesn't, not really Warpy Nov 2013 #63
on a side note, elehhhhna Nov 2013 #94
If and when we ever do achieve womb transplants... Barack_America Nov 2013 #96
My head hurts. Puzzledtraveller Nov 2013 #6
Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2013 #21
a fetus in NOT viable at 20 weeks cali Nov 2013 #7
Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2013 #10
Ok, I will answer with questions etherealtruth Nov 2013 #11
Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2013 #15
Logically ...? etherealtruth Nov 2013 #22
Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2013 #24
This is relevant in that in your scenario etherealtruth Nov 2013 #30
If the state was an interested party, it would promote abortion. Daemonaquila Nov 2013 #36
The central nervous system isn't intact until 24 weeks in utero. Therefore, JaneyVee Nov 2013 #12
Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2013 #14
some handmade34 Nov 2013 #45
Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2013 #46
I concur. Auntie Bush Nov 2013 #97
and certainly not a bunch of male politicians Blue_Roses Nov 2013 #102
Legally Mandated Forced Birthing. Is it really ever OK to legally enslave a woman? nt Zorra Nov 2013 #17
Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2013 #23
The moment of. n/t gollygee Nov 2013 #25
Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2013 #28
I would call it aggravated assault gollygee Nov 2013 #31
Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2013 #38
OK so obviously you don't think women CAN be trusted with children gollygee Nov 2013 #39
Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2013 #48
This is about whether the government should be involved. athena Nov 2013 #73
Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2013 #77
Let me ask you another question. athena Nov 2013 #80
Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2013 #85
The spouse is a separate person who isn't getting all the necessities of life gollygee Nov 2013 #86
No one is saying Congress should not make any laws. athena Nov 2013 #90
Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2013 #92
yes MattBaggins Nov 2013 #101
Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2013 #42
Because it is a separate person at 1 minute gollygee Nov 2013 #49
Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2013 #54
tou won't gwt an answer in that Niceguy1 Nov 2013 #33
Purists? gollygee Nov 2013 #37
no, the state is charged with looking Niceguy1 Nov 2013 #41
So long as that baby is getting all food, oxygen, and everything from the women gollygee Nov 2013 #43
ys they are because it is a viable life. Niceguy1 Nov 2013 #50
"I believe that women own their own bodies." ZombieHorde Nov 2013 #75
This is in the context of pregnancy gollygee Nov 2013 #78
In the realm we are discussing, it has no legal interest except post natal interest. Zorra Nov 2013 #51
A second after birth. MattBaggins Nov 2013 #100
Here's a great piece I refer to often... PeaceNikki Nov 2013 #18
Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2013 #19
I assume you are in favor of forced organ donations. athena Nov 2013 #26
Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2013 #29
So you are in favor of forced abortion but against forced organ donation! athena Nov 2013 #34
You think people don't own their own bodies gollygee Nov 2013 #35
Don't be silly gollygee etherealtruth Nov 2013 #52
Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2013 #57
good luck. you're gonna need it. Pretzel_Warrior Nov 2013 #59
That's a bit harsh MattBaggins Nov 2013 #103
Where do you place that point? etherealtruth Nov 2013 #62
Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2013 #68
I am sure we can agree smoking is a legal activity etherealtruth Nov 2013 #72
Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2013 #87
I am one of those funny people that believe woman ... etherealtruth Nov 2013 #91
Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2013 #93
I note that you have neglected to answer my questions. athena Nov 2013 #74
Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2013 #81
Organ donation preserves existing life etherealtruth Nov 2013 #82
Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2013 #88
It is necessary to look at inconsistencies in the reasoning etherealtruth Nov 2013 #89
What if part of an organ or tissue were needed for a newborn baby? gollygee Nov 2013 #83
People die because of organ unavailability. athena Nov 2013 #84
If the technology existed to transplant the fetus to a male MattBaggins Nov 2013 #105
I'm thinking the same thing kydo Nov 2013 #32
Perfectly said. Daemonaquila Nov 2013 #40
Sounds accurate to me etherealtruth Nov 2013 #44
You lost me at "Women have the right to choose whether they will get pregnant or not." cyberswede Nov 2013 #47
Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2013 #53
what about rape? n/t kydo Nov 2013 #55
Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2013 #58
yeah but what about the fetus? n/t kydo Nov 2013 #61
Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2013 #65
then why are you bothering us with this thread? n/t kydo Nov 2013 #66
Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2013 #69
right .... kydo Nov 2013 #71
This message was self-deleted by its author madinmaryland Nov 2013 #76
What about contraceptive failure? uppityperson Nov 2013 #99
also, something that many women on birth control Blue_Roses Nov 2013 #106
let me simplify it for you. choice. that simple. nt seabeyond Nov 2013 #56
I suppose whenever viability outside the womb occurs LittleBlue Nov 2013 #60
probably an unpopular view, but it's mine so I'll express it regardless.... mike_c Nov 2013 #64
I love your two cents! etherealtruth Nov 2013 #67
You can add mine in and make it 4 cents. nt Walk away Nov 2013 #104
Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2013 #70
Viability will never be 20 weeks or less REP Nov 2013 #79
Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2013 #95
It is impossible to "terminate a pregnancy after birth" because there is NO pregnancy then. uppityperson Nov 2013 #98
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Message auto-removed»Reply #4