1) Even the guest speaker in your video said they couldn't associate the radiation levels detected with Fukushima. That was a prudent move on their part, because high radiation levels have also been associated with coal-fired power plants and fracking wastes.
2) They reference RadCast.org, which has virtually nothing online to detail who they are, how they obtain their numbers, or any other critical information one would need to make a critical assessment of their validity. Their website is virtually devoid of anything one could use to determine if they are a credible source, one way or another: http://radcast.org/index.html#
3) No one else except RadCast has been reporting these numbers. I would expect that, at the very least, a few colleges around the nation would be getting odd readings as well, because many college campuses keep radiological records through the science departments and various student/faculty research.
4) It's also a very odd distribution pattern, with a spot in Wisconsin and areas of the East Coast reporting almost the same readings as California and the West Coast? And then ONE spike twice that of any others?
And since I'm in Minnesota, not California, I can't tell you how the marijuana crop is doing, sorry. I can tell you the corn and soybeans did great up here this year, and my beans, tomatoes and peppers did exemplary though, which is strange considering that Radcast.Org says a radioactive cloud snuck past us to get into Wisconsin 
Edit history
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
= new reply since forum marked as read