General Discussion

JaneyVee

(19,877 posts)

7. I don't think it was ever a cakewalk. Isn't McAuliffe only polling up 6?

Reply to hooverville29 (Reply #6)

Tue Nov 5, 2013, 09:22 PM

Nov 2013

This was always close. Cooch was leading in the beginning and McAuliffe only recently made gains.

Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

43 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

This message was self-deleted by its author [View all] lostincalifornia Nov 2013 OP

McAuliffe already flipped some Romney counties. JaneyVee Nov 2013 #1

good. lostincalifornia Nov 2013 #2

Chris Hayes cilla4progress Nov 2013 #3

I just commented on that. Might not be a cakewalk after all. hooverville29 Nov 2013 #6

I don't think it was ever a cakewalk. Isn't McAuliffe only polling up 6? JaneyVee Nov 2013 #7

Looking at Northern VA voting volume, this one might wind up closer than some thought hooverville29 Nov 2013 #4

Actually I am starting to get nervous now lostincalifornia Nov 2013 #10

Yeah, me too. I never thought McA would run away with it, but damn, what Nay Nov 2013 #25

latest figures I have seen... chillfactor Nov 2013 #5

50.1% kenny boy, 42.7 Terry. We will see cuccinelli drop below 50% very soon lostincalifornia Nov 2013 #8

With Sarvis pulling 8%, ultimate winner doesn't have to get 50+% -- and probably won't hooverville29 Nov 2013 #14

I recall from 2012 cilla4progress Nov 2013 #9

You are right lostincalifornia Nov 2013 #11

Indeed, in 2006, hours after the polls closed, it was all blue areas that still hadn't reported ShadowLiberal Nov 2013 #12

I think anyone who is looking at this on DU is nervous. I sure am /nt lostincalifornia Nov 2013 #15

Do you know what Nate's projection were cilla4progress Nov 2013 #18

Yes - I don't remember exactly, but I think Nate projects a Dem win at about 2.4% Grateful for Hope Nov 2013 #30

Comparing to 2012, 2 factors weigh heavily now, not present in 2012. We can discuss later. hooverville29 Nov 2013 #13

This message was self-deleted by its author Grateful for Hope Nov 2013 #31

McAuliffe now just down by 3. MoonRiver Nov 2013 #16

Yep, some projections are going that way. hooverville29 Nov 2013 #22

Update Robbins Nov 2013 #17

Thanks lostincalifornia Nov 2013 #19

No. Virginia and Charlottesville are usually last with results lanlady Nov 2013 #20

Their votes are being counted & reported, but lots still remain to go hooverville29 Nov 2013 #21

I cannot believe it's even this close LittleBlue Nov 2013 #23

It's pathetic, really. Arugula Latte Nov 2013 #24

Chickens voting for Col. Sanders... n/t backscatter712 Nov 2013 #29

McAuliffe only down by 1% now..n/t chillfactor Nov 2013 #26

Wow, McAuliffe just made up some big ground on the last update, he's down by only 1.3% now. StrictlyRockers Nov 2013 #27

Of course Grateful for Hope Nov 2013 #28

Cooch lead is down to 1.2% and McA needs to make up only 21,000 votes with 82% reporting. StrictlyRockers Nov 2013 #32

If he continues to gain 0.1% for every additional 1% of precincts that report... StrictlyRockers Nov 2013 #34

This always happens here in VA. Borgnine Nov 2013 #33

That's where the big blue numbers are. Lex Nov 2013 #35

It sure looks like you know what you are talking about... StrictlyRockers Nov 2013 #36

As a VA resident (NoVa), I know this is true but it's still nail-biting time Neurotica Nov 2013 #38

MacCauliffe just pulled ahead nadinbrzezinski Nov 2013 #40

Latest nadinbrzezinski Nov 2013 #37

Cuccinelli just made up some ground, he's up .6% now StrictlyRockers Nov 2013 #39

Oh god, it's so close now. Cooch has only a 0.2% lead. 88% of precincts reporting. StrictlyRockers Nov 2013 #41

ANNND...McAuliffe takes the lead!! StrictlyRockers Nov 2013 #42

McAuliffe's lead is 18,000 votes and growing. StrictlyRockers Nov 2013 #43