Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

saras

(6,670 posts)
2. "Life" in that case, may mean bacteria miles down in solid rock.
Wed Mar 7, 2012, 09:54 PM
Mar 2012

With a reasonable combination of chemical, biological, and nuclear weapons, we could pretty much eradicate multicellular life from the planet. We'd have to explicitly target important systems like the ionosphere and deep oceans rather than just big cities, but I think we could do a pretty thorough job. Remove the ozone layer with the longer-lasting gases, ramp up the production of the more effective greenhouse gases, poison the country's major aquifers, strip the vegetation with long-lasting poisons, vaporize a few thousand tons of plutonium into the air...

I think he vastly underestimates the damage we could do if we really set our minds to it.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Most Astounding Fact ...»Reply #2