Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

HughBeaumont

(24,461 posts)

6. Times sure have changed.

Reply to HockeyMom (Reply #2)

Thu Mar 8, 2012, 09:33 AM

Mar 2012

My talk about irreversability was . . . about 3 minutes. There was no morality or "what if" speech. Didn't even need my wife's signature. Doctors/pharmacists should just do their work and shut it. It wasn't his place to give you that talk.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

10 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

MO Rep. Stacey Newman Proposes Bill to Restrict Vasectomies [View all] proud2BlibKansan Mar 2012 OP

If this shit keeps up, the only "family planning" will be happening with cats-n-dogs! MADem Mar 2012 #1

When my husband got his vasectomy in 1984, HockeyMom Mar 2012 #2

My insurance company required me to have a psychiatric evaluation proud2BlibKansan Mar 2012 #3

Times sure have changed. HughBeaumont Mar 2012 #6

Even today, people - primarily women - still get a lecture or worse TlalocW Mar 2012 #9

Whew! At least they don't require a urethra-penetration ultrasound! nt JustABozoOnThisBus Mar 2012 #4

As my grandmother would say, "what's good for the goose is good for the gander" The Genealogist Mar 2012 #5

yes because everything has to be exacltly equal all the time, i had a hernia and some brokens ribs leftyohiolib Mar 2012 #8

I propose a law that restricts condom use for prevention of STDs only. qb Mar 2012 #7

It should require a rectal exam as well. With pictures. n/t Lil Missy Mar 2012 #10