General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Wikileak's Sarah Harrison, Snowden asylum assistant now in exile [View all]sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)since their creation.
For stevenleser's odd claims to be true, he would have to first, understand what Wikileaks is, which it is apparent he does not.
Let me ask you a question the answer to which should answer YOUR questions.
1) Did Wikileaks ever receive material from a Russian Whistle Blower?
and
2) Did Wikileaks not release that material?
You do understand that Wikileaks is NOT a news gathering organization. They publish ONLY material they receive from Whistle Blowers. Stevenleser apparently thinks they are a news gathering organization that they are deliberately not 'covering' corruption in Russia. That totally destroys his claims since they have never 'covered' any corruption anywhere. They have published documents received from Whistle Blowers period.
Now if you can prove that they withheld material from Russian Whistle Blowers, then YOU have a point. Otherwise your entire premise is undermined due to the fact it is based on a FALSE premise.
edited to add:
It's really simple, I am not aware of Wikileaks withholding material they received from a Russian Whistle Blower. I am interested to see stevenleser's evidence that they have, or yours. Otherwise he has no point. And if I were you, I would not want to be associated with such non credible accusations. But we'll see, I've given him a chance to provide evidence of his claims, this time with the knowledge of what Wikileaks actually does.