Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(57,696 posts)

1. So some dude from PA, without a degree in religion, can declare for

Thu Mar 8, 2012, 09:39 AM

Mar 2012

every human being in the world, what is a 'religious belief', but scientists and doctors can't define an abortifacient!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

8 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

GOP Rep on the definition of abortifacient: it's up to religious belief, not science [View all] muriel_volestrangler Mar 2012 OP

So some dude from PA, without a degree in religion, can declare for sinkingfeeling Mar 2012 #1

another idiot exposed Angry Dragon Mar 2012 #2

One obvious Newest Reality Mar 2012 #3

"I reject your reality and substitute my own" Odin2005 Mar 2012 #4

My devil's advocate post. Motown_Johnny Mar 2012 #5

The normal definition is that pregnancy does not start until implantation muriel_volestrangler Mar 2012 #6

that is the problem Motown_Johnny Mar 2012 #7

Mr. Murphy: Religious doctrine is inferior to logic and reason. Dawson Leery Mar 2012 #8