Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I support this father whole-heartedly….NO CHILD NEEDS to go to mcdonalds.. Tikki Nov 2013 #1
Well, there's the rub kcr Nov 2013 #3
He did eat…his mother took him to mcdonalds.. Tikki Nov 2013 #10
But he didn't send him back with a sack full of nutritious foods kcr Nov 2013 #13
Hopefully, lesson learned…this child obviously needs his father.. Tikki Nov 2013 #16
I don't think his intentions were bad kcr Nov 2013 #18
I think he was being punished for not giving into the child. Yes, a divorce situation.. Tikki Nov 2013 #26
Where did I claim anyone should have given him McDonalds? kcr Nov 2013 #46
Both parents need to go into mediation and discuss parameters. Tikki Nov 2013 #49
"not better than nothing" Silent3 Nov 2013 #76
+1 n/t Ms. Toad Nov 2013 #97
Did you not see the sentence where the father gave the kid a choice SheilaT Nov 2013 #52
Yes. So? kcr Nov 2013 #53
No. enlightenment Nov 2013 #60
Okay fine, do it at home kcr Nov 2013 #61
I think we're talking apples and oranges enlightenment Nov 2013 #66
If the kid continues to eat at McGrease He will have a photo future warrant46 Nov 2013 #94
The dad offered to take him somewhere else. The kid refused. stevenleser Nov 2013 #19
The headline is doing the spinning kcr Nov 2013 #22
Sorry, that is B.S. What is acceptable in a non-divorce situation should apply stevenleser Nov 2013 #44
I'm sorry kcr Nov 2013 #45
I'm not talking perfect world, I'm talking what happens 99.9999% of the time. stevenleser Nov 2013 #54
Well yes, but in custody battles it's not. kcr Nov 2013 #56
Which is exactly why I focused the problem on how things get spun in custody battles. stevenleser Nov 2013 #64
I think the problem, at least when discussing it, is the perception kcr Nov 2013 #71
I believe Solomon had the, or at least a, fix for that particular problem Fumesucker Nov 2013 #140
Cutting the cheeseburger in half? kcr Nov 2013 #144
I prefer to think of it as dividing the assets n/t Fumesucker Nov 2013 #165
Then you have not Ms. Toad Nov 2013 #100
Sorry kcr Nov 2013 #103
So your real life is more valid than mine. Ms. Toad Nov 2013 #109
Well, why is your real life more valid than mine? kcr Nov 2013 #112
If you want to visit the suspension notice and follow-up Ms. Toad Nov 2013 #120
If it's sending me actual personal info on other people, no kcr Nov 2013 #121
They are links to documents available on the internet, Ms. Toad Nov 2013 #135
And your offer doesn't change my point. kcr Nov 2013 #142
"No one ever offers real evidence that these ridiculous things happen." Ms. Toad Nov 2013 #146
How does your one case prove my point? kcr Nov 2013 #149
One of your points was that no one offers to provide evidence Ms. Toad Nov 2013 #152
Well good for you. kcr Nov 2013 #153
Are these people "somebody" up there, because how does one parent have enough clout to get Hestia Nov 2013 #122
He is a former corporate attorney. Not sure how prominent. stevenleser Nov 2013 #125
Such Bullshit dballance Nov 2013 #87
Okay, fine. kcr Nov 2013 #91
Because he gave the kid two options already dballance Nov 2013 #128
I don't think asking actually constitutes giving an option kcr Nov 2013 #129
Perhaps father was trying to be a good parent and this isn’t a case of not feeding a child left is right Nov 2013 #164
I think that's exactly what happened kcr Nov 2013 #168
That's how I was raised. 2naSalit Nov 2013 #115
some of us were spanked too. Doesn't mean we should excuse it now. liberal_at_heart Nov 2013 #143
Have you ever tried to feed a toddler? Barack_America Nov 2013 #155
I have raised two children, so yes I know how difficult it can be to get them to eat. liberal_at_heart Nov 2013 #169
Gues we'll have to 2naSalit Nov 2013 #163
He offered the child another meal. Ms. Toad Nov 2013 #96
He didn't offer it. He merely asked. kcr Nov 2013 #98
As several other posters have pointed out, Ms. Toad Nov 2013 #105
They are when you're a parent in a custodial battle. kcr Nov 2013 #107
Point to that quote in the article, please. Ms. Toad Nov 2013 #111
what am I exaggerating? kcr Nov 2013 #114
Here's a couple. Ms. Toad Nov 2013 #117
Not in the article? kcr Nov 2013 #119
Neither of those two statements Ms. Toad Nov 2013 #137
The statements verbatim aren't, but the info is. kcr Nov 2013 #141
No, the info is not. Ms. Toad Nov 2013 #145
But he didn't! kcr Nov 2013 #148
Well you actually have been saying it was unacceptable. Ms. Toad Nov 2013 #150
No. I never said it was unacceptable. kcr Nov 2013 #151
. Ms. Toad Nov 2013 #154
Really. kcr Nov 2013 #156
And nice cherry picking kcr Nov 2013 #157
I was respondig to your statment that you never said it was unacceptable. Ms. Toad Nov 2013 #158
And I didn't kcr Nov 2013 #159
wrong spot kcr Nov 2013 #113
And while we're at it kcr Nov 2013 #108
The point isn't what food he offered. Ms. Toad Nov 2013 #116
It is if he's going to claim they're deeming him unfit kcr Nov 2013 #118
The Boy did not get to eat that night and later died. BlueJazz Nov 2013 #102
Okay. Fine. kcr Nov 2013 #106
I was being sarcasic with all the other posts. BlueJazz Nov 2013 #127
Sorry. It's hard to tell. kcr Nov 2013 #131
so you want to treat a child like a dog dlwickham Nov 2013 #17
Actually I hope your not a parent FreakinDJ Nov 2013 #79
the child handmade34 Nov 2013 #2
He didn't give into a temper tantrum gollygee Nov 2013 #4
+1 Puzzledtraveller Nov 2013 #7
He didn't feed his child. I think that's the point of contention... randome Nov 2013 #9
"You can eat McD's or nothing" gollygee Nov 2013 #11
He could have taken the child to another restaurant. He didn't. kcr Nov 2013 #14
He said the option of another restaurant was there gollygee Nov 2013 #21
The option was there. The father should have taken it. kcr Nov 2013 #24
I think it would have been wisest to go to another restaurant gollygee Nov 2013 #29
I think if he'd done that kcr Nov 2013 #31
People get stuck in either/or mindsets gollygee Nov 2013 #33
To be clear, I don't think so either. kcr Nov 2013 #41
You never starve a 4 year old child. You never give them that kind of choice. randome Nov 2013 #15
The child could have gone to another restaurant gollygee Nov 2013 #20
That's a terrible view of parenting, IMO. A 4 year old who misses a meal is starving. randome Nov 2013 #25
Really. Who's the parent here? kcr Nov 2013 #27
I have a 4-year-old gollygee Nov 2013 #30
LOL, "A 4 year old who misses a meal is starving" snooper2 Nov 2013 #51
Yes, I raised 2 daughters. You do not let your child miss a meal. randome Nov 2013 #62
So what do you recommend if missing any single meal is supposedly such a calamity? Silent3 Nov 2013 #67
Good point. If the kid refuses to eat, that's a different matter. randome Nov 2013 #72
I understood it was the child who refused to eat. Kaleva Nov 2013 #78
The father did offer a different restaurant as well. Silent3 Nov 2013 #80
An empty tummy is unpleasant for a night. alphafemale Nov 2013 #138
That's hilarious. jeff47 Nov 2013 #70
Well, none of us knows this kid's physical requirements. randome Nov 2013 #73
The kids physical requirements are either they can miss a meal jeff47 Nov 2013 #95
You can't force a 4 year old to eat if they don't want to arikara Nov 2013 #86
Yep. The other side isn't commenting kcr Nov 2013 #12
His child refused to eat anything but McDonalds? NoOneMan Nov 2013 #37
No. Go home. Give the kid a banana. A piece of bread. Anything. randome Nov 2013 #75
My kid's temper tantrums were met with absolute refusal to do/buy Nay Nov 2013 #47
Giving into a temper tantrum is the worst thing you can do. alphafemale Nov 2013 #139
I wonder if the mother and psychologist are friends or share mutual friends... penultimate Nov 2013 #5
There MUST be more going on here than declining to go to McDonalds. Shrike47 Nov 2013 #6
There is, there is a divorce and custody... n/t PoliticAverse Nov 2013 #32
Certainly there is. lumberjack_jeff Nov 2013 #59
This sounds like my life Capt. Obvious Nov 2013 #8
I guess I'm wholly incapable for caring for my children... sarisataka Nov 2013 #23
This sounds like a setup. Say yes and you're unfit because you feed your kid junk. Say no and... JVS Nov 2013 #28
Sounds like the child comes by the stubborn honestly. IdaBriggs Nov 2013 #34
The kid learned that temper tantrums work B2G Nov 2013 #35
All the posts saying the father... Wait Wut Nov 2013 #36
But at least he would have tried. kcr Nov 2013 #48
Exactly. So well said I have nothing to add! stevenleser Nov 2013 #55
the dad made a stupid choice that would have been praised by most people 50 years ago yurbud Nov 2013 #38
when I was 4 years old, I ate what was on the table - restaurants not an option. ConcernedCanuk Nov 2013 #39
I don't think the story is the man, wife or child, it's the shrink hughee99 Nov 2013 #40
Is Mom paying the shrink? bklyncowgirl Nov 2013 #82
I gotta be honest both my parents used to make dinner and put it in front of me say this is dinner Arcanetrance Nov 2013 #42
Exactly. Sheldon Cooper Nov 2013 #74
I don't believe this. Nine Nov 2013 #43
All ya gotta know is "custody battle" which turns parenting into a political campaign of smears and stevenleser Nov 2013 #65
Agreed. Mom and shrink both sound like assholes with an agenda, and Dad Nay Nov 2013 #166
How did I know that that the words "custody battle" would be involved? JHB Nov 2013 #50
Why would ANY parent give a 4-year-old a CHOICE? That's insane. nt valerief Nov 2013 #57
I give my 4 your old a choice all the time. hugo_from_TN Nov 2013 #69
Exactly!!! pipi_k Nov 2013 #89
perfect answer! Scout Nov 2013 #90
^^^THIS^^^ TorchTheWitch Nov 2013 #93
+1. We started doing this as soon as my kid had the ability to indicate a preference. winter is coming Nov 2013 #161
That's brilliant! nt IronLionZion Nov 2013 #167
There's quite a bit of research on that Nevernose Nov 2013 #110
Fast food aside, if you give in to temper tantrums you will get more of them. LeftyMom Nov 2013 #58
If that's the case, that shrink would have found my parents incapable of caring for me Vashta Nerada Nov 2013 #63
If you're going to give a kid pipi_k Nov 2013 #68
He did not offer the child a choice between McDs and hunger. Ms. Toad Nov 2013 #104
Stories like this make me happy to be childless. nt geek tragedy Nov 2013 #77
+1 Silent3 Nov 2013 #81
Kid sounds like a spoiled brat to me. bklyncowgirl Nov 2013 #83
Thing is... pipi_k Nov 2013 #88
The father offered to take the kid somewhere else--the kid refused--McDonalds or nothing. bklyncowgirl Nov 2013 #99
The article is so simplistic that it's pointless to think we know what happened. nolabear Nov 2013 #84
I agree with the father. Frustratedlady Nov 2013 #85
Our family was vegetarian: me, Dad and son. No meat and all was well. Until soccer and after-game libdem4life Nov 2013 #92
No, actually, I'd say that makes him an excellent father. Arkana Nov 2013 #101
The child is a spoiled brat LittleBlue Nov 2013 #123
Assuming the father's version of the story is true... ljm2002 Nov 2013 #124
I support the father for 2 reasons. appleannie1 Nov 2013 #126
Pardon me for butting in, because sometimes you know I come up with ideas that are just too crazy... derby378 Nov 2013 #130
Assuming that this story is being reported accurately (which is not always the case, of course) LeftishBrit Nov 2013 #132
Why do I think there is MORE to this story? SoCalDem Nov 2013 #133
Because of course there is Egnever Nov 2013 #147
LOL. When my kid was a young toddler (as in <2), we ordered a Caesar salad winter is coming Nov 2013 #162
I don't know any parent that thinks giving in to temper tantrums is good parenting Taitertots Nov 2013 #134
exactly Niceguy1 Nov 2013 #136
Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2013 #160
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Dad 'wholly' incapable of...»Reply #38