Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

rock

(13,218 posts)

7. What would it cost the Dems to change the rules and not allow

Reply to cali (Original post)

Fri Nov 8, 2013, 04:51 PM

Nov 2013

the virtual (logical?) filibuster? Meaning that to filibuster the repiggies would actually put in some effort. Oh yeah, when the shoe was on the other foot, so would the Dems. Oh wait, they practically never filibuster!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

7 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Uh huh. Yeah, sure. [View all] cali Nov 2013 OP

Wolf! AndyA Nov 2013 #1

lol. cali Nov 2013 #4

... PoliticAverse Nov 2013 #2

Harry, either shit or get off the pot. Scuba Nov 2013 #3

For a long time I've wondered if the Democrats really don't want to get anything done LuvNewcastle Nov 2013 #5

invoking the nuclear option would certainly get obamacare off the front pages scheming daemons Nov 2013 #6

What would it cost the Dems to change the rules and not allow rock Nov 2013 #7