Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

PeaceNikki

(27,985 posts)
6. Also, your reply doesn't prove me "wrong" it only states it's ok, because... independents?
Fri Nov 8, 2013, 07:51 PM
Nov 2013

Not buying it.

ETA: The Democratic Party dropped the "safe, legal, rare" language from the platform in 2008 for all of these reasons. Get with the program.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

k and r--thank you for posting niyad Nov 2013 #1
I had to explain why that phrase pisses me off so badly. PeaceNikki Nov 2013 #2
Well it was rare enough in your family to allow you to be alive. That's good hooverville29 Nov 2013 #34
ridiculous. PeaceNikki Nov 2013 #36
Which response merely means you don't have an answer hooverville29 Nov 2013 #37
answer? to what? you didn't ask a fucking question. PeaceNikki Nov 2013 #39
Post removed Post removed Nov 2013 #43
Yes. That's a fucking ridiculous point. PeaceNikki Nov 2013 #45
You're dodging around again. You're glad you're alive, right? hooverville29 Nov 2013 #48
Making the dumb Reagan "I've noticed that everybody that is for abortion has already been born" PeaceNikki Nov 2013 #49
:) Is that inaccurate? hooverville29 Nov 2013 #50
It's ridiculous. Just like Reagan. PeaceNikki Nov 2013 #51
Oh for fuck's sake this argument is LUDICROUS. MadrasT Nov 2013 #81
PPR'd as an anti-choice troll gollygee Nov 2013 #96
Thank you, Skinner! Zorra Nov 2013 #99
Whoops. In wrong place. HERVEPA Nov 2013 #57
Hmmm. Exact same thing I hear from the antis while escorting at Planned Parenthood HERVEPA Nov 2013 #59
That's right, and... Oilwellian Nov 2013 #61
I use the phase all the time. chemp Nov 2013 #78
to quote LeftyMom from another thread... PeaceNikki Nov 2013 #79
You are wrong Gman Nov 2013 #3
It's a MEDICAL issue not a social issue. PeaceNikki Nov 2013 #4
Of course it's medical Gman Nov 2013 #7
Also, your reply doesn't prove me "wrong" it only states it's ok, because... independents? PeaceNikki Nov 2013 #6
Good stuff - K&R - nt Ohio Joe Nov 2013 #5
Let's make poverty and all the many other inequities rare first. n/t Whisp Nov 2013 #8
That's not how most people see it. Not even most DUers. Nye Bevan Nov 2013 #9
Which is why I feel the need to explain how and why it's harmful. PeaceNikki Nov 2013 #10
Argument ad populum, but you don't care. Warren Stupidity Nov 2013 #12
These are the popular beliefs because they've been pushed on us. PeaceNikki Nov 2013 #13
So unlike you, 80% of DUers are unable to think for themselves, Nye Bevan Nov 2013 #16
This isn't about Clinton or specific politicians. It's about the general conversation of PeaceNikki Nov 2013 #17
Thanks Hillary. For pandering. Yeah we should just all have that baby and give it up for adoption. WCLinolVir Nov 2013 #40
Abortion is a medical issue, and should be no more controversial than any other medical issue... Humanist_Activist Nov 2013 #11
Sure it should. Costly and more physically traumatic procedures should be less frequent scheming daemons Nov 2013 #25
A full-term pregnancy and childbirth are both more likely to cause complications than an abortion. Laffy Kat Nov 2013 #80
Thanks for making this point. OnionPatch Nov 2013 #121
K&R&Thank you. Egalitarian Thug Nov 2013 #14
"Saying it should be "rare" indicates - clearly - that it is happening more than it should be" Spitfire of ATJ Nov 2013 #15
How far could the US reduce the number of abortions and would that meet the threshold for "rare"? PeaceNikki Nov 2013 #18
You ask the wrong question. Spitfire of ATJ Nov 2013 #33
Well the opposite of rare is common. zeemike Nov 2013 #19
Maybe they should not run on a platform about abortion. WCLinolVir Nov 2013 #47
Well that would be great if we set the agenda. zeemike Nov 2013 #54
i want effective and available birth control to make it rare scheming daemons Nov 2013 #20
How far could the US reduce the number of abortions and would that meet the threshold for "rare"? PeaceNikki Nov 2013 #21
I want all medical procedures as rare as possible scheming daemons Nov 2013 #24
Do you not see, even a little, how using the "rare" language can be harmful? PeaceNikki Nov 2013 #35
If I said I want mastectomies safe and rare, that wouldn't be controversial scheming daemons Nov 2013 #38
i. get. that. But you don't say that. And legislators are not trying to defund Oncology Depts. PeaceNikki Nov 2013 #41
Right wingers are wrong and should be defeated on this. scheming daemons Nov 2013 #44
how about... not 'rare'? PeaceNikki Nov 2013 #46
+100 dionysus Nov 2013 #91
Birth control is a medical procedure. Warren Stupidity Nov 2013 #74
birth control is preventative medicine scheming daemons Nov 2013 #75
um uh I'm sure you find that to be a distinction, but it is one without a difference. Warren Stupidity Nov 2013 #83
exact opposite. access to morning after pills should be free scheming daemons Nov 2013 #106
Why? They are abortifacients, shouldn't they be rare too? Warren Stupidity Nov 2013 #108
Response scheming daemons Nov 2013 #109
Abortions are "physically traumatic" and "prohibitively expensive". Warren Stupidity Nov 2013 #119
youre wrong scheming daemons Nov 2013 #120
Look, I can't speak for the person you responded to, but I can to the OP. PeaceNikki Nov 2013 #122
Abortions occur when there is a pregnancy, not before. boston bean Nov 2013 #123
Why? Do you think there is something wrong with having an abortion? Warren Stupidity Nov 2013 #73
K&R Solly Mack Nov 2013 #22
k&r Starry Messenger Nov 2013 #23
trashing thread. liberal_at_heart Nov 2013 #26
ok.... PeaceNikki Nov 2013 #27
aren't you heartbroken? La Lioness Priyanka Nov 2013 #30
Understandable. REP Nov 2013 #31
Post stalk much? That was from September? Agschmid Nov 2013 #112
I wish abortion was rare passiveporcupine Nov 2013 #28
and everyone knows this. this spate of excuses as to why this is not shaming women La Lioness Priyanka Nov 2013 #29
And so many people don't even realize they're doing it. Undermining a cause they purportedly support nomorenomore08 Nov 2013 #32
Exactly. That's why I discuss with liberals who say this whenever I can. PeaceNikki Nov 2013 #42
Well, the opposite of rare is frequent. kestrel91316 Nov 2013 #52
I think the division comes in using the term. boston bean Nov 2013 #56
Oh, that's bullshit. PeaceNikki Nov 2013 #58
+1 Oilwellian Nov 2013 #65
I agree with you passiveporcupine Nov 2013 #71
The opposite of rare is not rare, or common. Not "frequent". uppityperson Nov 2013 #101
You know what I am noticing in this thread and mine. boston bean Nov 2013 #53
Agreed. It's patronizing, "I'll let it slide" bullshit. PeaceNikki Nov 2013 #55
And they use the "rare" talking point which confuses people. boston bean Nov 2013 #60
You said passiveporcupine Nov 2013 #72
I adamantly disagree Yo_Mama Nov 2013 #62
None of that has to do with what should be un prohibited access to abortion if one boston bean Nov 2013 #66
I would never use the term safe, legal and rare Yo_Mama Nov 2013 #70
Like BB stated- it's the framing of the discussion that's the problem. Words mean things. PeaceNikki Nov 2013 #68
I simply don't agree. 99Forever Nov 2013 #63
fanfuckingtastic PeaceNikki Nov 2013 #64
Makes us precisely even. 99Forever Nov 2013 #67
You seem to have a problem with one who is voicing an opinion. boston bean Nov 2013 #69
always thought the rare thing was bs and just one reason why i trust hilary as far as i can throw dembotoz Nov 2013 #76
Increasing access to sexual protection against unwanted pregnancy and STD's is the key alphafemale Nov 2013 #77
I am in complete agreement. MadrasT Nov 2013 #82
Of course it should be rare. thesquanderer Nov 2013 #84
I honestly understand the thesis, however I can't get past the fact that that is a phrase I associat arely staircase Nov 2013 #85
I am against abortion for myself. ScreamingMeemie Nov 2013 #86
Recommend. nt Zorra Nov 2013 #87
Insistence on trying to make others convert to your extreme view is an hallmark of an ideologue. KittyWampus Nov 2013 #88
Extreme? The Democratic National Party stopped using it PeaceNikki Nov 2013 #89
i don't know about that. abortion is a serious surgery and can be dangerous. if readily available dionysus Nov 2013 #90
you missed the point PeaceNikki Nov 2013 #92
i didn't miss the point. we just interpret the phase differently, i suppose. dionysus Nov 2013 #93
I encourage you to open your mind and see the ways it can be harmful is all PeaceNikki Nov 2013 #94
i have no reason to quarrel! dionysus Nov 2013 #95
Abortion is not "serious surgery" it's a very safe minor outpatient procedure. LeftyMom Nov 2013 #111
I don't see why having a pro-choice stance necessarily entails... D23MIURG23 Nov 2013 #97
First, abortion is not bad. Anymore than cardiac bypass is "bad". PeaceNikki Nov 2013 #98
I'm not "soft pro-choice" at all. D23MIURG23 Nov 2013 #107
k&r with thanks for continuing to work to keep the right to a legal medical abortion accessible. uppityperson Nov 2013 #100
In conclusion: back off with the 'soft support'. If you don't fully support abortion rights, STFU. PeaceNikki Nov 2013 #102
Thanks for this OP, PeaceNikki. It shows how DU has changed, Pathwalker Nov 2013 #103
Thank you for your support. It's been... eyeopening. PeaceNikki Nov 2013 #104
Great OP, I totally agree with the premise the author is writing about. Major Hogwash Nov 2013 #105
thank you for getting it PeaceNikki Nov 2013 #110
I disagree that this is "devaluing" the right. pnwmom Nov 2013 #113
the national party platform was updated to remove the stigma. sad that DU is lagging so far behind. PeaceNikki Nov 2013 #114
No. "Rare" means that we should have a society that encourages preventing unplanned pregnancies. phleshdef Nov 2013 #115
so... you want unwanted pregnancies to be rare? hey, me, too!! PeaceNikki Nov 2013 #116
I really have no idea where you are coming from. phleshdef Nov 2013 #117
Wisconsin. You? PeaceNikki Nov 2013 #118
100% agree. Ineeda Nov 2013 #124
With my trusty calculator... Lars39 Nov 2013 #125
When the clintons called for safe, legal and rare abortions applegrove Nov 2013 #126
sigh. really? a gop tactic? "this kick"? PeaceNikki Nov 2013 #127
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»A linguistic trick of aff...»Reply #6