General Discussion

ProSense

(116,464 posts)

16. This is

Reply to Drunken Irishman (Original post)

Mon Dec 19, 2011, 02:00 AM

Dec 2011

all about the desperation of trying to define Obama as a failure or highly flawed.

That is why it's important to keep repeating it. They're angry that anyone dares to challenge that notion and that they haven't succeeded in convincing everyone of that fact. Think about premise of the name calling: Obama "defenders" are somehow preventing a true debate on the issues..."cheerleading" is getting in the way of criticism.

It's laughable.

As the election draws closer, they get louder in their condemnation, pretending that they've had an epiphany after all the President's "failures," but it's the same criticisms (Social Security, ending the war, Guantanamo) being repeated over and over, regardless of the President's overall record. Congress' role in the process is also ignored to lay the blame for every obstacle at the President's feet. This was true of Guantanamo.

Remember John MacArthur, Harper's publisher who called for Obama to be dumped?

March 2009: Obama is Far from a Radical Reformer
http://www.commondreams.org/view/2009/03/18-6

June 2009: Obama a Very Smooth Liar
http://www.commondreams.org/view/2009/06/17-4

December 2009: More and More, Obama Seems a Faux Liberal
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/john-r-macarthur/more-and-more-obama-seems_b_394341.html

Yeah, I knew the President wasn't a "radical reformer," but I had no idea how his Presidency would unfold two months into its existence.

MacArthur isn't the only one who has focused his negativity on Obama since early in his term.

Now he's calling for Obama to be dumped?

The Case for Obama...a truly historic presidency
http://www.democraticunderground.com/100233108

The "Bush = (insert Democrat's name)" equation has failed miserably
http://www.democraticunderground.com/100238406

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

61 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Morally bankrupt? [View all] Drunken Irishman Dec 2011 OP

Good rant... SidDithers Dec 2011 #1

Thank you. tabatha Dec 2011 #2

Pretty good - but: cliffordu Dec 2011 #3

Something get your Irish up? Scurrilous Dec 2011 #4

I voted for Gore and Obama. tblue Dec 2011 #5

No. Just the right to bitch... Drunken Irishman Dec 2011 #8

The fact that you are honest enough tblue Dec 2011 #18

Thank you. Well said. -nt CakeGrrl Dec 2011 #6

i voted for gore. i always vote DesertFlower Dec 2011 #7

Obviously you're not a selfish person... Drunken Irishman Dec 2011 #9

my grandfather was president of a DesertFlower Dec 2011 #13

You forgot contemptible addict. DevonRex Dec 2011 #10

Well, I can't wait to hear the rebuttal to this. Old and In the Way Dec 2011 #11

I have to say... Spazito Dec 2011 #12

Hear, hear! Summer Hathaway Dec 2011 #14

Al Gore won in 2000 but the US supreme court threw our votes out and then voted 5-4 and selected Citizen Worker Dec 2011 #15

I was about to point that out WHEN CRABS ROAR Dec 2011 #20

Probably not, almost certainly not, and possible. MH1 Dec 2011 #45

This is ProSense Dec 2011 #16

But no one said anything resembling your claim jpgray Dec 2011 #17

Hmmm, this is the statement I distinctly remember as casting Obama supporters as "morally bankrupt" Spazito Dec 2011 #19

But that does not refer to Obama's supporters jpgray Dec 2011 #22

Who are the "defenders" as opposed to the "supporters" in your mind... Spazito Dec 2011 #26

Very few Obama supporters resemble those described in the OP jpgray Dec 2011 #28

Then the OP I cited was sadly lacking in clarity... Spazito Dec 2011 #30

I perceive that you are correct Owlet Dec 2011 #37

interesting SwampG8r Dec 2011 #29

Frustration is one thing, labeling Obama supporters as "defenders who are morally corrupt... Spazito Dec 2011 #32

i find it sad they reference any obama supporters SwampG8r Dec 2011 #61

But ProSense Dec 2011 #21

For the OP referred to in this thread, you could replace Obama's name with any president's jpgray Dec 2011 #23

Seriously, ProSense Dec 2011 #25

Good. Wait Wut Dec 2011 #48

Anyone who defends Clinton's deregulation and welfare reform-- eridani Dec 2011 #56

The jury was unanimous. joshcryer Dec 2011 #24

I voted for Al Gore. Lugnut Dec 2011 #27

K + R deacon Dec 2011 #31

I hope you feel better Tsiyu Dec 2011 #33

It is so absurd, I mean what is the point? JNelson6563 Dec 2011 #34

ITA. nt DevonRex Dec 2011 #38

Can you say "hyperbole?" Tsiyu Dec 2011 #39

love it or leave it? got it. no thanks. piratefish08 Dec 2011 #35

turning around and calling others the same thing G_j Dec 2011 #36

sometimes you just have to stand up Whisp Dec 2011 #42

walked on? G_j Dec 2011 #47

words are words, aren't they? Whisp Dec 2011 #49

Simple reply but thank you. SunsetDreams Dec 2011 #40

Righteous Rant! Whisp Dec 2011 #41

hey, you made it to DU3! try the BOG sometime! dionysus Dec 2011 #43

Well said . MH1 Dec 2011 #44

Sorry I was late to this. K&R. great white snark Dec 2011 #46

Kick Scurrilous Dec 2011 #50

True Blue Cool Post :) bottom line Dec 2011 #51

K&R. I missed the thread where the Obama supporters were accused gateley Dec 2011 #52

Don't feel bad you missed out. There is a brand new sequel today emulatorloo Dec 2011 #53

Beautiful rant! McCamy Taylor Dec 2011 #54

K&R treestar Dec 2011 #55

Hey Irish... Number23 Dec 2011 #57

Excellent ! nevergiveup Dec 2011 #58

Best rant I've read for ages! yellerpup Dec 2011 #59

This is DU ... not REALITY!!!!! JoePhilly Dec 2011 #60