Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I agree with all your points, completely. CaliforniaPeggy Nov 2013 #1
Post removed Post removed Nov 2013 #2
What the Hell? Whiskeytide Nov 2013 #5
Only that it's a "undercooked meat/rare" joke. Chan790 Nov 2013 #9
I got that... Whiskeytide Nov 2013 #13
It was inappropriate which was why I ignored it. n/t cynatnite Nov 2013 #16
It was mysteriously: freshwest Nov 2013 #54
IMO the sentiment behind that statement teenagebambam Nov 2013 #3
Speaking for myself, when I say they should be rare Revanchist Nov 2013 #4
A lot of my friends had them and it was a tough decision for all of them Warpy Nov 2013 #6
I can't remember feeling relief, but I never felt any guilt. cynatnite Nov 2013 #17
Here's what your avatar had to say on the subject: Nye Bevan Nov 2013 #7
That was an entire generation ago. a lot has happened since. PeaceNikki Nov 2013 #12
The year 2005 was "an entire generation ago"? Nye Bevan Nov 2013 #30
Shouldn't any expensive or risk medical procedure be rare if it could be avoided with prevention? NoOneMan Nov 2013 #8
Abortions are generally neither. LeftyMom Nov 2013 #10
I actually had a friend who ended up with complications due to a surgical abortion. KittyWampus Nov 2013 #18
I had a life threatning reaction to a common antibiotic. LeftyMom Nov 2013 #24
Abortions are cheaper and safer than condoms? NoOneMan Nov 2013 #22
If you're not going to argue in good faith I wish you a lovely evening. LeftyMom Nov 2013 #25
That is exactly the entire argument you responded to NoOneMan Nov 2013 #26
You compared abortion to open heart surgery, which is what I replied to. LeftyMom Nov 2013 #27
Did I? Beyond being something that could be avoided with prevention, no, I did not. NoOneMan Nov 2013 #31
"Of course they should be rare, just like bypasses." -you, upthread LeftyMom Nov 2013 #33
Yes, ANYTHING that has a less invasive, less costly alternative should be rare NoOneMan Nov 2013 #34
Abortion isn't an alternative to contraception. It's an alternative to PREGNANCY. LeftyMom Nov 2013 #38
So is contraception and education not an alternative/prevention to pregnancy? NoOneMan Nov 2013 #41
Strawman argument Lordquinton Nov 2013 #36
Birth control and eduction is not an alternative/prevention to abortion? NoOneMan Nov 2013 #37
You are confused here Lordquinton Nov 2013 #42
There are lots of ways to make any procedure rare NoOneMan Nov 2013 #47
No one is arguing against preventing pregnancy when it's not desired. cui bono Nov 2013 #58
Birth control is a prevention of unwanted pregnancies. NoOneMan Nov 2013 #65
It can be both Lordquinton Nov 2013 #59
"they shouldn't be discussed together" NoOneMan Nov 2013 #66
You skipped the first paragraph Lordquinton Nov 2013 #105
By surrendering and cowering to a word you are thereby enabling them by giving it power and validity NoOneMan Nov 2013 #106
Abortion is sure cheaper than condoms in UK. And early abortion is not a "surgical procedure". idwiyo Nov 2013 #44
Huh? But the NHS is on the hook for it. It is reflected in per capita health costs NoOneMan Nov 2013 #50
The state shouldn't have anything to do with the actual medical procedure. Her body, Her choice. idwiyo Nov 2013 #60
Of, for fuck's sake. How about the state ensure its legal, safe and rare? NoOneMan Nov 2013 #64
How about state ensure it's safe, legal, on demand, and as often as requested. idwiyo Nov 2013 #68
Rare was part of the Democratic platform! NoOneMan Nov 2013 #75
was. was... as in isn't anymore. PeaceNikki Nov 2013 #91
Change the word YOU use. Leave the rest of the pro-choicers the fuck alone NoOneMan Nov 2013 #92
Simmer down, cheif. Do you not see, even a little, how using the "rare" language can be harmful? PeaceNikki Nov 2013 #93
In a narrow frame, yes, as harmful as any word can be in a narrow frame NoOneMan Nov 2013 #94
Continuing to use harmful language will also draw negative reactions. PeaceNikki Nov 2013 #95
"Calling for it to be "rare" proposes that there is something wrong with abortion" NoOneMan Nov 2013 #96
I never ever ever said you or ANYONE who uses the phrase was such a thing. PeaceNikki Nov 2013 #97
What do you propose to do with women who refuse to take pill? Deny them abortion? idwiyo Nov 2013 #107
Nothing. Not a fucking thing. Its a choice NoOneMan Nov 2013 #108
Choice means abortion should be free, safe, legal, on demand, and as often as requested. idwiyo Nov 2013 #110
I agree on all parts NoOneMan Nov 2013 #111
I question "so often" part. No one actually has any idea what "often" is or isn't. idwiyo Nov 2013 #112
Oh god. Fucking semantics police NoOneMan Nov 2013 #113
Spare me your condescension. By using "rare" and "so often" you ARE implying that there are too many idwiyo Nov 2013 #114
Haha. By suggesting what I am implying you are just creating a strawman NoOneMan Nov 2013 #115
Your "ignore" as a badge of honour! Never mind that you WILL read my responses to your posts. :) idwiyo Nov 2013 #116
I think it's neither "pig" nor ignorant." phylny Nov 2013 #72
take for instance the abortion pill, still an abortion but no knife La Lioness Priyanka Nov 2013 #11
You know... NoOneMan Nov 2013 #40
What do you mean when you say "long, unnecessary cycles of oral contraceptives"? n/t cynatnite Nov 2013 #43
Exactly what I said NoOneMan Nov 2013 #46
I see your point... cynatnite Nov 2013 #52
Maybe when one has sex very infrequently, as one is not in a relationship. idwiyo Nov 2013 #48
Did I miss something? newcriminal Nov 2013 #100
Yes. Her body, her choice. idwiyo Nov 2013 #104
or dangers associated with actually giving birth. nt La Lioness Priyanka Nov 2013 #86
No other medical procedure endangers the lives of the medical professionals involved. Cassidy Nov 2013 #45
This thread is against those that want abortion "safe, legal and rare" NoOneMan Nov 2013 #51
first trimester abortions are the safest of all surgical procedures. CTyankee Nov 2013 #71
They are not safer than other methods of preventing unwanted pregnancies, nor cheaper NoOneMan Nov 2013 #74
I wasn't talking about prevention as much as the safety of the procedure. And since any CTyankee Nov 2013 #76
Of course. Instead you argue a narrow frame to divisively fight with other pro-choice people NoOneMan Nov 2013 #78
well, my bad for writing "any" instead of "no" in that sentence. Shoulda caught that... CTyankee Nov 2013 #88
Got it NoOneMan Nov 2013 #89
well, to be fair, I used to work for Planned Parenthood of CT and folks there were pretty CTyankee Nov 2013 #90
"Rare" in this context means different things to different people. ZombieHorde Nov 2013 #14
Thank you. PeaceNikki Nov 2013 #15
That's the political genius and moral cowardice of the phrase. LeftyMom Nov 2013 #19
there is no moral cowardice. There's mostly an attempt by some to twist the issue away KittyWampus Nov 2013 #21
well said. PeaceNikki Nov 2013 #23
It's never bothered me to hear people say the phrase at all... cynatnite Nov 2013 #35
So why do people want it to mean the worse? NoOneMan Nov 2013 #82
nailed it Vattel Nov 2013 #84
I had not thought of the word "rare" like that... Whiskeytide Nov 2013 #28
You break it down very well, as usual. nomorenomore08 Nov 2013 #39
Yeeeeeeah. Why is there any kind of snappy phrase hanging round abortion anyway? sibelian Nov 2013 #109
Sorry, the issue are far right control freaks, not liberals trying to improve reproductive choices KittyWampus Nov 2013 #20
Good post, agree with all your points ! nt steve2470 Nov 2013 #29
I believe that it should be safe, legal, rare but always available on demand. xmas74 Nov 2013 #32
Big 'Ol.... DeSwiss Nov 2013 #49
I am sorry you had to make that choice, but TxDemChem Nov 2013 #53
"abortion should be rare" whttevrr Nov 2013 #55
Is an abortion the best, most efficeint, and safest way to reduce the rates of unwanted pregnancies? Agnosticsherbet Nov 2013 #56
"deal with an" suggests a pregnancy already exists NoOneMan Nov 2013 #57
Because I see the loss of life as regrettable but feel the woman's autonomy is paramount LostOne4Ever Nov 2013 #61
"some people here feel the need to talk to us as if we were anti-choice" NoOneMan Nov 2013 #67
Agreed. Xolodno Nov 2013 #62
Unwanted Pregnancies Should Be Rare eShirl Nov 2013 #63
Birth control should be easily accessible to all and rendered shame-free through education alphafemale Nov 2013 #69
I never got the shame of buying protection. Always loved it, actually. sir pball Nov 2013 #77
Pregnancy s/b rare. We've got too many damn people as it is. nt valerief Nov 2013 #70
Undoubtably NoOneMan Nov 2013 #80
In reading the threads on this topic boston bean Nov 2013 #73
It is an invasive medical procedure. Of course it carries risks and can be traumatic NoOneMan Nov 2013 #79
au contraire boston bean Nov 2013 #85
I agree with all of the measures you suggest. bvar22 Nov 2013 #81
This isn't so clear cut NoOneMan Nov 2013 #83
Not Clear Cut???!!! bvar22 Nov 2013 #98
Did you read my response? NoOneMan Nov 2013 #99
Yes I read your response. bvar22 Nov 2013 #101
I don't understand why you would want to make abortion rare if the alternative produces more harm NoOneMan Nov 2013 #102
It looks like you've gotten a lot of explanations. LWolf Nov 2013 #87
Why would anyone want unwanted pregnancies to be common? jberryhill Nov 2013 #103
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I don't understand when s...»Reply #39