Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Morally bankrupt? [View all]jpgray
(27,831 posts)17. But no one said anything resembling your claim
There is much that is morally bankrupt and contemptible in any president, and those who defend them at their worst should be prepared to face criticism. Think of Clinton with financial deregulation, free trade with China, welfare reform - think of FDR and Japanese internment, court packing, etc. Defenders of those policies deserve all the criticism they receive.
A refusal to defend such garbage does not amount to rejection of Clinton or FDR, and refusal to defend Obama at his worst does not amount to a rejection of his presidency, or his candidacy in 2012.
To support a president or party does not require we pretend our lies are answers. If being asked to do so were grounds for rejecting a candidate, we could never vote for anyone.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
61 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Al Gore won in 2000 but the US supreme court threw our votes out and then voted 5-4 and selected
Citizen Worker
Dec 2011
#15
Hmmm, this is the statement I distinctly remember as casting Obama supporters as "morally bankrupt"
Spazito
Dec 2011
#19
Frustration is one thing, labeling Obama supporters as "defenders who are morally corrupt...
Spazito
Dec 2011
#32