Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: After 50 years, sometimes it's time to just leave it alone. [View all]ljm2002
(10,751 posts)98. I replied earlier but wanted to expand...
...on my response, because there was a nagging voice in the back of my head that said "But aren't some records sealed by the government sealed for exactly 50 years? and if that's the case, doesn't that mean that 50 years later may be exactly when we are able to get new information?"
It turns out my memory was correct. Many files were sealed for 50 years, including some pertaining to the Kennedy assassination. Here are a few links illustrating that fact (emphasis mine):
http://www.sanduskyregister.com/article/4845971
5 decades later, some JFK probe files still sealed
Five decades after President John F. Kennedy was fatally shot and long after official inquiries ended, thousands of pages of investigative documents remain withheld from public view. The contents of these files are partially known and intriguing and conspiracy buffs are not the only ones seeking to open them for a closer look.
Some serious researchers believe the off-limits files could shed valuable new light on nagging mysteries of the assassination including what U.S. intelligence agencies knew about accused assassin Lee Harvey Oswald before Nov. 22, 1963.
It turns out that several hundred of the still-classified pages concern a deceased CIA agent, George Joannides, whose activities just before the assassination and, fascinatingly, during a government investigation years later, have tantalized researchers for years.
"This is not about conspiracy, this is about transparency," said Jefferson Morley, a former Washington Post reporter and author embroiled in a decade-long lawsuit against the CIA, seeking release of the closed documents. "I think the CIA should obey the law. I don't think most people think that's a crazy idea."
Five decades after President John F. Kennedy was fatally shot and long after official inquiries ended, thousands of pages of investigative documents remain withheld from public view. The contents of these files are partially known and intriguing and conspiracy buffs are not the only ones seeking to open them for a closer look.
Some serious researchers believe the off-limits files could shed valuable new light on nagging mysteries of the assassination including what U.S. intelligence agencies knew about accused assassin Lee Harvey Oswald before Nov. 22, 1963.
It turns out that several hundred of the still-classified pages concern a deceased CIA agent, George Joannides, whose activities just before the assassination and, fascinatingly, during a government investigation years later, have tantalized researchers for years.
"This is not about conspiracy, this is about transparency," said Jefferson Morley, a former Washington Post reporter and author embroiled in a decade-long lawsuit against the CIA, seeking release of the closed documents. "I think the CIA should obey the law. I don't think most people think that's a crazy idea."
http://www.maryferrell.org/wiki/index.php/Freeing_the_JFK_Files
Freeing the JFK Files
(...)
The most prominent post-Watergate investigation into intelligence agency abuses, the Church Committee, conducted a limited investigation related to the JFK assassination. A slim report with the bland title "The Investigation of the Assassination of President John F. Kennedy: Performance of the Intelligence Agencies" belied its devastating critique of the FBI and CIA's relation to the Warren Commission. But, as is the custom for Senate investigations, the files upon which the Committee's conclusions were based were locked up for 50 years.
(...)
The most prominent post-Watergate investigation into intelligence agency abuses, the Church Committee, conducted a limited investigation related to the JFK assassination. A slim report with the bland title "The Investigation of the Assassination of President John F. Kennedy: Performance of the Intelligence Agencies" belied its devastating critique of the FBI and CIA's relation to the Warren Commission. But, as is the custom for Senate investigations, the files upon which the Committee's conclusions were based were locked up for 50 years.
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-07-26/public-has-no-right-to-know-for-50-years-with-senate-redo-taxes.html
Public Has No Right to Know for 50 Years With Senate Redo: Taxes
Leaders of the tax-code rewrite in Congress pledged to keep ideas submitted by lawmakers secret for 50 years, seeking to assuage concerns that leaks of comments may jeopardize relationships with fundraisers or constituents.
(...)
The secrecy contrasts with most records. Senate Historian Don Ritchie said most files automatically open after 20 years, and some can be sealed for 50 years to protect personal privacy, national security, or the confidentiality of a congressional investigation. The records of Senator Joe McCarthys secret hearings were opened in 2003, 50 years after they were held, he said. A committee chairman can interpret investigation to cover the examination of legislation, he said.
Leaders of the tax-code rewrite in Congress pledged to keep ideas submitted by lawmakers secret for 50 years, seeking to assuage concerns that leaks of comments may jeopardize relationships with fundraisers or constituents.
(...)
The secrecy contrasts with most records. Senate Historian Don Ritchie said most files automatically open after 20 years, and some can be sealed for 50 years to protect personal privacy, national security, or the confidentiality of a congressional investigation. The records of Senator Joe McCarthys secret hearings were opened in 2003, 50 years after they were held, he said. A committee chairman can interpret investigation to cover the examination of legislation, he said.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
118 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
When everything associated with the tragedy is declassified, I would agree with you.
MADem
Nov 2013
#8
Sources and methods, most likely. That said, those sources are long gone now, and those methods
MADem
Nov 2013
#113
If there is something to actually be learned, I think it is important to dig.
Behind the Aegis
Nov 2013
#9
It does. History has been written and re-written many times as new things come to light.
Behind the Aegis
Nov 2013
#34
And without the fact, crazy CT's are presented by those that wish the facts to remain hidden.
RC
Nov 2013
#111
In 1633, there are those who wanted others to join them in not looking through Galieleo's telescope.
AnotherMcIntosh
Nov 2013
#36
A small minority of Oswald-acted-alone theorists oppose a consideration of science and logic.
AnotherMcIntosh
Nov 2013
#89
For those that are interested in scientific reasoning on the two topics raised above
BootinUp
Nov 2013
#92
Ah, a diversion. To talk about the single-bullet theory which I did not raise.
AnotherMcIntosh
Nov 2013
#93
Sorry, but the opposition to science and logic is all on the side of the conspiracists.
Spider Jerusalem
Nov 2013
#118
My ESL student, an engineer from Mexico, asked me about the Kennedy assassination today...
CTyankee
Nov 2013
#23
So if someone were able to prove without a doubt there was a second shooter (or more)
meadowlark5
Nov 2013
#41
The truth is Oswald did it and ZERO evidence exists to dispute that or prove a conspiracy. Move on.
RBInMaine
Nov 2013
#53
I take it you've not really read much on the topic, including the news of the second commission.
WinkyDink
Nov 2013
#62
I've read plenty, and there is no credible nor solid evidence anywhere to prove a conspiracy. ALL
RBInMaine
Nov 2013
#69
I'll never get why discussing this stuff bothers some people so much they want to shut it down...
Gidney N Cloyd
Nov 2013
#48
Neglecting the appeal of a revoluion by revelation. That one fact would change the world.
freshwest
Nov 2013
#56
Often it's after their deaths that the hidden connections and truths come out
bigbrother05
Nov 2013
#82
You don't want discussion. That's the point of your OP, in case you'd forgotten
DisgustipatedinCA
Nov 2013
#115