Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: After 50 years, sometimes it's time to just leave it alone. [View all]Ava Gadro
(36 posts)114. OIC. Thanks for clearing that up for me.
People love conspiracy theories. Some look at it as an unsolved puzzle. Some like to examine the groups involved and their commonalities. Some for the psyche. And some just to turn a profit. Me? Not so much. I prefer to look to the future.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
118 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
When everything associated with the tragedy is declassified, I would agree with you.
MADem
Nov 2013
#8
Sources and methods, most likely. That said, those sources are long gone now, and those methods
MADem
Nov 2013
#113
If there is something to actually be learned, I think it is important to dig.
Behind the Aegis
Nov 2013
#9
It does. History has been written and re-written many times as new things come to light.
Behind the Aegis
Nov 2013
#34
And without the fact, crazy CT's are presented by those that wish the facts to remain hidden.
RC
Nov 2013
#111
In 1633, there are those who wanted others to join them in not looking through Galieleo's telescope.
AnotherMcIntosh
Nov 2013
#36
A small minority of Oswald-acted-alone theorists oppose a consideration of science and logic.
AnotherMcIntosh
Nov 2013
#89
For those that are interested in scientific reasoning on the two topics raised above
BootinUp
Nov 2013
#92
Ah, a diversion. To talk about the single-bullet theory which I did not raise.
AnotherMcIntosh
Nov 2013
#93
Sorry, but the opposition to science and logic is all on the side of the conspiracists.
Spider Jerusalem
Nov 2013
#118
My ESL student, an engineer from Mexico, asked me about the Kennedy assassination today...
CTyankee
Nov 2013
#23
So if someone were able to prove without a doubt there was a second shooter (or more)
meadowlark5
Nov 2013
#41
The truth is Oswald did it and ZERO evidence exists to dispute that or prove a conspiracy. Move on.
RBInMaine
Nov 2013
#53
I take it you've not really read much on the topic, including the news of the second commission.
WinkyDink
Nov 2013
#62
I've read plenty, and there is no credible nor solid evidence anywhere to prove a conspiracy. ALL
RBInMaine
Nov 2013
#69
I'll never get why discussing this stuff bothers some people so much they want to shut it down...
Gidney N Cloyd
Nov 2013
#48
Neglecting the appeal of a revoluion by revelation. That one fact would change the world.
freshwest
Nov 2013
#56
Often it's after their deaths that the hidden connections and truths come out
bigbrother05
Nov 2013
#82
You don't want discussion. That's the point of your OP, in case you'd forgotten
DisgustipatedinCA
Nov 2013
#115