Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Benton D Struckcheon

(2,347 posts)
11. There is no trade-off, on a macro level
Sun Nov 10, 2013, 04:49 PM
Nov 2013

That's because of the "propensity to consume" the add'l dollar, which is extremely high for low wage workers, for obvious reasons. As that add'l dollar is spent in places where low wage workers work, like Wal-Mart and 7/11 and so on, those places would have to balance the add'l demand against the add'l expense. I'll bet it easily cancels, if not leaning towards hiring more workers to meet the demand. Productivity improvements would of course be made, but you can only stretch that so far to meet the increased demand.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Raising the minimum wage ...»Reply #11