Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Daring to Complain About Obamacare [View all]CTyankee
(67,931 posts)13. well, if the repubs are successful in getting rid of the ACA, it may sweep away concerns about
socialized medicine and get us REAL universal coverage, perhaps in the form of Medicare for All.
I can only hope...
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
91 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I believe Anthem Blue Cross are now being persued....for false information.
VanillaRhapsody
Nov 2013
#28
Author of famous self help book 'Marry Him: The Case for Settling for Mr. Good Enough'
Bluenorthwest
Nov 2013
#3
but as I say downthread, wouldn't the editor of that section have realized that?
CTyankee
Nov 2013
#10
Anthem Blue Cross is the company in trouble for lying to their clients about ACA
VanillaRhapsody
Nov 2013
#29
Premiums which go to for-profit insurers aren't the same as taxes for nonprofit schools.
Romulox
Nov 2013
#11
ACA manipulates us into thinking that buying a for-profit *product* is an act of altruism.
Romulox
Nov 2013
#12
well, if the repubs are successful in getting rid of the ACA, it may sweep away concerns about
CTyankee
Nov 2013
#13
I don't agree. With the ACA, we have never been farther from true universal care.
Romulox
Nov 2013
#14
Of course. At the time Obama was starting to build it, it seemed like the viable
CTyankee
Nov 2013
#16
I fail to see what your post proves about the author, or how it invalidates her critique. nt
Romulox
Nov 2013
#18
You're making assumptions about her position. I'm not comfortable judging how much people should
Romulox
Nov 2013
#44
She is presenting herself as a middle class person financially burdened by ACA when she is not.
Nine
Nov 2013
#48
You don't know that. It shouldn't matter. This is mandatory corporate profit, which is wrong. nt
Romulox
Nov 2013
#55
I wonder if she is just "self promoting" by writing something provocative in the NYT...
CTyankee
Nov 2013
#19
and your point is...she asks like she is expecting a coherent response...
VanillaRhapsody
Nov 2013
#87
Of course. Insurance is a *for-profit* endeavor. Insurers make money by denying care. nt
Romulox
Nov 2013
#22
I know. I want single payer, but it's a start. and the profits are now limited thanks to ACA
PeaceNikki
Nov 2013
#23
It's not at all clear that "it's a start". It empowers the worst actors in healthcare
Romulox
Nov 2013
#24
it's a start because a lot of people who haven't been able to see a doctor will be able to
PeaceNikki
Nov 2013
#25
The cost of private health insurance is ultimately unsustainable. This does little to help. nt
Romulox
Nov 2013
#45
80% of a larger premium = more profit. This provision could actually drive costs higher. nt
Romulox
Nov 2013
#53
Read up on how other nations implemented their national health care systems.
Ikonoklast
Nov 2013
#67
Unfortunately, you're wrong. That's still how insurance works. It's just that it's mandatory, now.
Romulox
Nov 2013
#47
Thank you. ACA manipulates the public by offering the illusion that people pay less.
woo me with science
Nov 2013
#36
