Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Abortion has never been rare. Why is that an expectation now? [View all]NoOneMan
(4,795 posts)46. "I do not see any way you can say it is not."
I am not saying it is not. Im not saying either. I'm just asking for how you (or the other poster) can prove that it is.
Read through this to see how access is restricted.
I get all that. I guess what would be useful is to see a time line to see if such restrictions correlate to a drop in the rate of abortion, as Gollygee suggested that there should be a relationship. If those were all in place since the 80s, then they should have no bearing.
In any case, has not access to birth control and sex education similarly reduced unwanted pregnancies in much the same way that would correlate with the abortion rate dropping? Teen pregnancies are certainly down. Honestly, I do not know if prevention programs are more or less prevalent than the 80s.
Many have closed because of that threat, further limiting access.
Do you have a graph of number of providers since 70s? I couldn't find anything like that.
On edit: here is a graph of the number of providers:

There is a significant decline. But it almost appears to be entirely from hospitals, right?
Oh, hear is another interesting graph:

Countries with liberal abortion laws, and presumably better access, have lower abortion rates than the others. Though, this may also correlate with them having better prevention programs or completely different demographic makeups and social trends
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
78 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Perhaps one of the other dozen or so threads on this question could answer your question
hughee99
Nov 2013
#1
The real question is, why do people feel the need to add rare as a condition of supporting choice?
Gormy Cuss
Nov 2013
#10
"covered by...single payer" is also setting a condition that is superfluous to the core concept.
Gormy Cuss
Nov 2013
#61
The group that supports " & rare" as a platform for discussing unwanted pregnancies aids pro-lifers.
Gormy Cuss
Nov 2013
#65
No, but if you said "I like chocolate and peanut butter" I wouldn't offer you caramel
Gormy Cuss
Nov 2013
#70
If you don't understand what the people on this board mean when they say rare by now
Revanchist
Nov 2013
#3
Is there mandatory wait period or reporting to another person? How far does someone have to
uppityperson
Nov 2013
#26
I never claimed abortions are "becoming more rare" and notice how YOUR chart shows it going back up?
uppityperson
Nov 2013
#33
Here is the page that chart is from and another, same source. Notice all the access restrictions?
uppityperson
Nov 2013
#41
Yup, kill off enough, close enough small clinics and the few that stay open have good security.
uppityperson
Nov 2013
#42
I do not know how the number of abortion providers have fared in the last few decades
NoOneMan
Nov 2013
#48
There are any number of medical procedures that I think should be safe and legal
onenote
Nov 2013
#50
Ok, who sent out the memo to post flamebaiting, divisive OPs about "rare" abortions
kestrel91316
Nov 2013
#58
It's been discussed for years. It was updated in platform in 2008, DU is late to catch up on this.
PeaceNikki
Nov 2013
#63
Because religion is more important to some people than women's bodies and autonomy
TransitJohn
Nov 2013
#77