Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Abortion has never been rare. Why is that an expectation now? [View all]REP
(21,691 posts)49. BC may be more affordable and available, but that doesn't change the effectiveness
From the CDC:
Copper T intrauterine device (IUD) Typical use failure rate: 0.8%.
Levonorgestrel intrauterine system (LNG IUD) Typical use failure rate: 0.2%.
Implant Typical use failure rate: 0.05%.
Injection or "shot" Typical use failure rate: 6%.
Combined oral contraceptives Typical use failure rate: 9%.
Patch Typical use failure rate: 9%.
Diaphragm or cervical cap Typical use failure rate: 12%.
Male condom Typical use failure rate: 18%.
Female condom Typical use failure rate: 21%, and also may help prevent STDs.
Spermicides Typical use failure rate: 28%.
Levonorgestrel intrauterine system (LNG IUD) Typical use failure rate: 0.2%.
Implant Typical use failure rate: 0.05%.
Injection or "shot" Typical use failure rate: 6%.
Combined oral contraceptives Typical use failure rate: 9%.
Patch Typical use failure rate: 9%.
Diaphragm or cervical cap Typical use failure rate: 12%.
Male condom Typical use failure rate: 18%.
Female condom Typical use failure rate: 21%, and also may help prevent STDs.
Spermicides Typical use failure rate: 28%.
The ones I have put in bold are among the most popular and result in 6-12 pregnancies per 100 women per year per method.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
78 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Perhaps one of the other dozen or so threads on this question could answer your question
hughee99
Nov 2013
#1
The real question is, why do people feel the need to add rare as a condition of supporting choice?
Gormy Cuss
Nov 2013
#10
"covered by...single payer" is also setting a condition that is superfluous to the core concept.
Gormy Cuss
Nov 2013
#61
The group that supports " & rare" as a platform for discussing unwanted pregnancies aids pro-lifers.
Gormy Cuss
Nov 2013
#65
No, but if you said "I like chocolate and peanut butter" I wouldn't offer you caramel
Gormy Cuss
Nov 2013
#70
If you don't understand what the people on this board mean when they say rare by now
Revanchist
Nov 2013
#3
Is there mandatory wait period or reporting to another person? How far does someone have to
uppityperson
Nov 2013
#26
I never claimed abortions are "becoming more rare" and notice how YOUR chart shows it going back up?
uppityperson
Nov 2013
#33
Here is the page that chart is from and another, same source. Notice all the access restrictions?
uppityperson
Nov 2013
#41
Yup, kill off enough, close enough small clinics and the few that stay open have good security.
uppityperson
Nov 2013
#42
I do not know how the number of abortion providers have fared in the last few decades
NoOneMan
Nov 2013
#48
There are any number of medical procedures that I think should be safe and legal
onenote
Nov 2013
#50
Ok, who sent out the memo to post flamebaiting, divisive OPs about "rare" abortions
kestrel91316
Nov 2013
#58
It's been discussed for years. It was updated in platform in 2008, DU is late to catch up on this.
PeaceNikki
Nov 2013
#63
Because religion is more important to some people than women's bodies and autonomy
TransitJohn
Nov 2013
#77