General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: JFK Conference: James DiEugenio made clear how Foreign Policy changed after November 22, 1963 [View all]Bolo Boffin
(23,872 posts)I find them highly offensive. If you want, I'll apologize to you for saying you are a conspiracy theorist. You clearly consider that term an insult, and even though I find it simply descriptive, that's no excuse for calling someone a name they find offensive. So I am truly sorry for doing that.
But this accusations that I am monitoring your words and spending all my time with you and further implications that I work for the CIA or whoever? They have to stop. Those accusations couldn't be more wrong. What I am doing, Octafish, is reading the words you write on a public discussion board for progressives and liberals. I am a progressive Democrat. I like Democratic Underground. You are here writing things on this public forum and I am reading them and I am responding to them. That is what I am doing. And you are going to have to get used to that happening, whereas I don't have to and will not get used to your constant insults.
Stop them immediately.
Thank you for letting me know you have heard that the Dictabelt is irrelevant to any discussion of what happened in Dealey Plaza. Since the Dictabelt was recording a motorcycle two miles away from Dealey Plaza, matching its audio to the Zapruder tape is an exercise in futility and/or confirmation bias. Take your pick.
The subject of JFK does deserve more study. More records do need to be released. The life, presidency, and death of John F. Kennedy will be a fruitful source of study and discussion for a long time. And I have never implied that it is not.