General Discussion

DonRedwood

(4,359 posts)

5. How about Clinton/Warren together :0)

Reply to Tarheel_Dem (Reply #2)

Tue Nov 12, 2013, 06:07 PM

Nov 2013

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

60 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

It would be easier for me to get excited about Elizabeth Warren [View all] pnwmom Nov 2013 OP

I think she could sharp_stick Nov 2013 #1

I don't have a metaphorical dog in the fight between the HRC & EW factions here at DU. However, I.. Tarheel_Dem Nov 2013 #2

How about Clinton/Warren together :0) DonRedwood Nov 2013 #5

Look, I'll vote for the eventual nominee, but I think the VP should be someone with Executive... Tarheel_Dem Nov 2013 #7

He's just plain awesome to me. His family background, lovely wife and adorable daughter, committed libdem4life Nov 2013 #14

I couldn't agree more. I think he has an awesome future ahead of him, and I hope it begins a..... Tarheel_Dem Nov 2013 #17

I remember the first time I saw them interviewed, one of them joked that the only way to tell them libdem4life Nov 2013 #18

He's already publicly refused to be considered for either Pres. or VP in 2016. Chan790 Nov 2013 #19

Now you went and gave me a sad. Tarheel_Dem Nov 2013 #29

Another V.P. possibility is Gary Locke, two-term popular governor of Washington, pnwmom Nov 2013 #23

I've said it many times but I'll say it again: Governor Martin O'Malley. PragmaticLiberal Nov 2013 #48

Julian Castro is a FANTASTIC candidate. But at the risk of totally ruining bullwinkle428 Nov 2013 #37

I think that is a great idea Lns.Lns Nov 2013 #33

I believe HRC has another large advantage over EW. pnwmom Nov 2013 #22

Ditto! She doesn't have to introduce herself. I don't think there's anything people don't know. Tarheel_Dem Nov 2013 #24

But principle matters as much as electability. Ken Burch Nov 2013 #50

A candidate who won't survive the general election won't do us any good. pnwmom Nov 2013 #52

Not one that would be open to bombing Middle Eastern countries. Ken Burch Nov 2013 #55

Seattle isn't predictive of anything nationally. pnwmom Nov 2013 #56

I'm much more confident Warren can win than Hillary. Scuba Nov 2013 #3

Do you have anything in the way of scientific proof that "She has the ability to motivate the base" Tarheel_Dem Nov 2013 #10

Yes, check out her fundraising record. Scuba Nov 2013 #15

That's it. That's your empirical evidence that she "motivates the base"? If that's the case..... Tarheel_Dem Nov 2013 #20

Does Warren motivate you? Scuba Nov 2013 #21

About as much as Dennis Kucinich. Nice lady. Tarheel_Dem Nov 2013 #26

Good that we know where you stand. Scuba Nov 2013 #30

She will stand up to the banks and Wall Street DonRedwood Nov 2013 #4

How's Chris Christie polling in confederate states? JaneyVee Nov 2013 #6

times are different, Obama would not have won in those days JI7 Nov 2013 #8

why do you want another Republican Democrat? yurbud Nov 2013 #9

I don't. I want a Democrat who will beat the real Republican pnwmom Nov 2013 #25

they don't have to be perfect--they just have to differ from Republicans on economic and foreign yurbud Nov 2013 #34

You don't think Obama differs much from Republicans? pnwmom Nov 2013 #35

I've been paying very close attention, especially since I teach at a public college and my wife yurbud Nov 2013 #39

i completely agree with you about the failures of education reform. pnwmom Nov 2013 #40

it is not even the number that matters. It is the specific issues and the harm done in each yurbud Nov 2013 #41

The country isn't John Wayne hawkish anymore. Ken Burch Nov 2013 #51

Goldwater suffered a similar trouncing. Warren Stupidity Nov 2013 #11

Me too gopiscrap Nov 2013 #12

Mondale did not even take Massachusetts hfojvt Nov 2013 #13

Why do you assume Hillary would be a Bill clone? Isn't it possible pnwmom Nov 2013 #27

btw, it couldn't be more obvious that this is all about Hillary for you cali Nov 2013 #43

It's all about winning for me. pnwmom Nov 2013 #44

The comment that she lacks the "fire in the belly" resonated with me. There is a level of libdem4life Nov 2013 #16

I would LOVE to see her on the SCOTUS, and I think that's a much better pnwmom Nov 2013 #28

Just imagine, we could have both of them doing what they do best...driving the Republicans libdem4life Nov 2013 #32

I am in the same place. I never MineralMan Nov 2013 #31

She has said she isn't running BainsBane Nov 2013 #36

Slow news cycle. Jamaal510 Nov 2013 #49

Yeah, I was pretty heartbroken about that too. Le Taz Hot Nov 2013 #38

for pity's sake. how much more are you going to beat this very dead horse with the McGovern cali Nov 2013 #42

Eagleton. nt DisgustipatedinCA Nov 2013 #45

One, she won't be running against Nixon's campaign team Ken Burch Nov 2013 #46

It's a very different world. HuckleB Nov 2013 #47

In 72 we still had a middle class Butch McQueen Nov 2013 #53

A few decades and a lot of water under the bridge have passed Armstead Nov 2013 #54

I think George McGovern was a strong candidate. LWolf Nov 2013 #57

What I hate is having to vote for the "lesser of evils." alarimer Nov 2013 #58

In effect, what you are saying is: kentuck Nov 2013 #59

This isn't the 60s or 70s. NuclearDem Nov 2013 #60