Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Left wants challenger for Hillary Clinton [View all]jeff47
(26,549 posts)19. No, I'm saying candidate Obama was campaigning
Which was not a perfect reflection of how he would govern. Partially because he was trying to win, and partially because people attached all their political hopes to the man.
For example, a ton of people on DU complained that Obama didn't immediately pull out of Afghanistan upon taking office. But Obama promised during his campaign to stay in Afghanistan - those posters attached their wishes to the man, ignoring what he actually said in favor of what they wanted him to do.
There was not a "move to the right". It was the same guy he was in the IL state government and Congress. The fact that we wished for someone better did not mean we got someone better.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
42 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I like the idea and hope they can find someone credible. Not a Nader/Perot-type. No. No. No.
libdem4life
Nov 2013
#1
A Primary Challenger is by definition a member of the same Party seeking the same
Bluenorthwest
Nov 2013
#10
I'll help you get the "hang" of the post...no Independent, Green, or anti-Hillary
libdem4life
Nov 2013
#21
Does not relate. Early internal political energy.We can handle supporting two candidates and monitor
libdem4life
Nov 2013
#25
I think the left has an up hill battle. Big corp money isnt going to help a progressive. nm
rhett o rick
Nov 2013
#3
With respect I think you have it backwards. Corporate dollars make winners.
rhett o rick
Nov 2013
#18
Why should they, really, every other post here is a "Corporate money is vile" post. Who wants
libdem4life
Nov 2013
#34
I hear what you are saying but I just have a hard time with the bad cop / worse cop choices we
rhett o rick
Nov 2013
#38
I get it. But how else do you do a Two-Party System? We don't have a Parliament. Somehow, someway
libdem4life
Nov 2013
#39
It would pretty hard to find anyone to the right of Hillary to challenge her.
Tierra_y_Libertad
Nov 2013
#24
Some of us on the left wants to wait until after 2014 to worry about Pres. candidates.
Vashta Nerada
Nov 2013
#33
Before we anoint Warren the Progressive President, perhaps we could ask her to put her name on the
libdem4life
Nov 2013
#40