Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: HEADS UP: Wikileaks Leaks Key TPP Documents [View all]BelgianMadCow
(5,379 posts)71. I know, it's acronym salad, but I asked for the TTIP, not the TPP
these two are the two parts of the pincher movement.
TTIP = Transatlantic Trade & Investment Partnership. Here's George Monbiot on the Guardian about it.
Remember that referendum about whether we should create a single market with the United States? You know, the one that asked whether corporations should have the power to strike down our laws? No, I don't either. Mind you, I spent 10 minutes looking for my watch the other day before I realised I was wearing it. Forgetting about the referendum is another sign of ageing. Because there must have been one, mustn't there? After all that agonising over whether or not we should stay in the European Union, the government wouldn't cede our sovereignty to some shadowy, undemocratic body without consulting us. Would it?
The purpose of the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership is to remove the regulatory differences between the US and European nations. I mentioned it a couple of weeks ago. But I left out the most important issue: the remarkable ability it would grant big business to sue the living daylights out of governments which try to defend their citizens. It would allow a secretive panel of corporate lawyers to overrule the will of parliament and destroy our legal protections. Yet the defenders of our sovereignty say nothing.
The purpose of the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership is to remove the regulatory differences between the US and European nations. I mentioned it a couple of weeks ago. But I left out the most important issue: the remarkable ability it would grant big business to sue the living daylights out of governments which try to defend their citizens. It would allow a secretive panel of corporate lawyers to overrule the will of parliament and destroy our legal protections. Yet the defenders of our sovereignty say nothing.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
117 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
of course you are surprised… ideologues can't fathom how people are able to support a politician,
KittyWampus
Nov 2013
#52
That's a strange thing to say. The poster most certainly can "fathom that people can
rhett o rick
Nov 2013
#77
The true defense is: World-wide Fascism. The proffered one will be "Trade helps everybody."
WinkyDink
Nov 2013
#110
I don't know how to move a post so i posted a link to my previous comment that sheds some light
kelliekat44
Nov 2013
#113
Good luck. I got about 1/3 of the way through it before my eyes started to bleed.
Buns_of_Fire
Nov 2013
#23
Papantino did an excellent expose...and discusses what to expect from the MSM...
adirondacker
Nov 2013
#105
Excellent point made here and this should be everywhere so that people who are not
sabrina 1
Nov 2013
#25
He was so right. Now I understand why they were afraid of him. And I completlely understand why
sabrina 1
Nov 2013
#117
k&r for exposure. I am very suspicious of the TPP. It's nice to get some info. on it. n/t
Laelth
Nov 2013
#18
Thank you for speaking the truth MNBrewer. This world is a dirty place. Assange, Bradley, Snowden
chimpymustgo
Nov 2013
#107
This news is Big Fucking Deal Bad on every level. Thank you for forwarding it.
ancianita
Nov 2013
#38
What! Attention whore Assange is just trying to make Wikileaks look relevant.
riderinthestorm
Nov 2013
#40
Corporatists say "Sssh... It's an 'agreement', not a 'treaty'! We can't pass a treaty!"
cascadiance
Nov 2013
#44
Thank you Wikileaks. Sad that this is the only way to know what our government is doing.
liberal_at_heart
Nov 2013
#53
Huge K&R. This administration and Congress are trying to hide the looting
woo me with science
Nov 2013
#66
You're right - I didn't catch that one - but she didn't attempt to defend Obama's position.
Divernan
Nov 2013
#82
So - higher drug prices and the ability for other countries to sue American cities if they don't
djean111
Nov 2013
#115
Not possible. Wikileaks was just one person and he was given the treatment.
Warren Stupidity
Nov 2013
#96
Let's bet on whether they will make it onto network "news." I crack myself up!
WinkyDink
Nov 2013
#109
Since anyone who questions anything AT ALL that Obama does is now an "ideologue",
djean111
Nov 2013
#114