Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Elizabeth Warren is out of touch with the Democratic Party. [View all]Laelth
(32,017 posts)11. Noam Scheiber, the Senior Editor of The New Republic, says this:
On one side is a majority of Democratic voters, who are angrier, more disaffected, and altogether more populist than theyve been in years. They are more attuned to income inequality than before the Obama presidency and more supportive of Social Security and Medicare.1 Theyve grown fonder of regulation and more skeptical of big business.2 A recent Pew poll showed that voters under 30who skew overwhelmingly Democraticview socialism more favorably than capitalism. Above all, Democrats are increasingly hostile to Wall Street and believe the government should rein it in.
http://www.newrepublic.com/article/115509/elizabeth-warren-hillary-clintons-nightmare
http://www.newrepublic.com/article/115509/elizabeth-warren-hillary-clintons-nightmare
No doubt, the party is divided, but Scheiber says the liberals are gaining strength and are likely to win.
Judging from recent events, the populists are likely to win.
<snip>
the party has changed far more over the last few years than is widely understood. Chris Murphy, the Connecticut senator, estimates that not too long ago, congressional Democrats were split roughly evenly between Wall Street supporters and Wall Street skeptics. Today, he puts the skeptics strength at more like two-thirds.
<snip>
the party has changed far more over the last few years than is widely understood. Chris Murphy, the Connecticut senator, estimates that not too long ago, congressional Democrats were split roughly evenly between Wall Street supporters and Wall Street skeptics. Today, he puts the skeptics strength at more like two-thirds.
Make of that what you will. I think Elizabeth Warren is more in tune with the heart and soul of the party, as Scheiber argues.
-Laelth
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
61 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I'm pretty sure if you polled Democrats they would agree with her on all those subjects but ok
Ash_F
Nov 2013
#5
While some of the issues you cite are clearly fiscal, you're correct that the Party ....
Scuba
Nov 2013
#22
There's no difference between "social" and "fiscal" issues. They're one in the same. nt
Romulox
Nov 2013
#35
One of the major implications of gay marriage is, in fact, benefits bestowed by the Federal Gov't,
Romulox
Nov 2013
#40
I'm the one who said that they are one in the same. That's the opposite of "hair splitting". nt
Romulox
Nov 2013
#49
Not all, but a great many. And sadly, those people are the very people with the p[ower and money
truedelphi
Nov 2013
#23
Sad but true except the current (D)s have made criminal banks even bigger
Corruption Inc
Nov 2013
#19
Many of us who have more TRADITIONAL Democratic Party views feel the corporatist DLCers should leave
cascadiance
Nov 2013
#55
The "not as bad" wing of the Democratic Party is out of touch with Elizabeth Warren.
Tierra_y_Libertad
Nov 2013
#59