Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LooseWilly

(4,477 posts)
27. Walmart, McDonald's, TacoTown, etc... all probably live there somewhere
Wed Nov 13, 2013, 09:32 PM
Nov 2013

Corporations don't respond to taxes by cutting benefits to their own employees... they cut benefits to their employees whenever they think they can get away with it in order to reduce "labor costs" and thereby increase the profit ratios on their books... the notion that they do so in response to something as specific as an increased municipal tax is specious at best.

In any case... A) I don't see how these minimum wage sweatshop-like retail outlets could cut the benefits to their employees any more than they already have. B) It will help the town pay the public employees who have been providing services to those same corporate tenants, taking the burden off homeowners and others who would otherwise have to foot the bill for yet another bond to re-structure payments. C) Precious little income taxes from those employees gets to the municipalities... especially considering the fact that most probably make so little that they get EIC refunds and very likely also SNAP and even HUD assistance just to get by. D) If the corporate tenants try to play hardball and clear out... that might open up an opportunity for some small business to open up shop... likely paying better wages to employees and also likely not expecting the same sort of super-favorable tax and services treatment as the big box retail shops expect... and in the process more of the revenues are liable to be spent locally and thereby returned to the community, rather than being diverted to a corporate HQ banking account and diverted to shareholders and CEO bonuses.

All told... I see a pretty sizeable net benefit for the town... if only the managers would run it on something other than a corporate model.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

"burdensome salary and pension costs" KatyMan Nov 2013 #1
If cities mismanage their finances they will go bankrupt hack89 Nov 2013 #2
I suspect that optimistic projections were only a part of the problem- can you say RDA? LooseWilly Nov 2013 #19
The employees are not to blame hack89 Nov 2013 #20
Tax those corporate tenants... there's plenty of money there LooseWilly Nov 2013 #23
I doubt a small resort town has a lot of corporate tenants hack89 Nov 2013 #25
Walmart, McDonald's, TacoTown, etc... all probably live there somewhere LooseWilly Nov 2013 #27
So what percentage will you tax them at hack89 Nov 2013 #28
Exactly! It's the city's failure to set aside moneys for their contracted obligations SharonAnn Nov 2013 #29
budget messes are every where in the public sector beachbum bob Nov 2013 #3
The reason pension cost rose is because they upaloopa Nov 2013 #9
Well, technically... a defined benefit plan's cost can't "rise"... LooseWilly Nov 2013 #24
I work for a county government and am a SEIU upaloopa Nov 2013 #30
In some years past, maybe as far as decades Trillo Nov 2013 #4
Why don't you do some research on the subject upaloopa Nov 2013 #10
One of my landlords was a retired cop (probation officer), he also told the same story, Trillo Nov 2013 #13
That has nothing to do with pensions upaloopa Nov 2013 #15
That's not what I read, or was told, Trillo Nov 2013 #16
I am a government worker what I said is true upaloopa Nov 2013 #17
"Six figure pensions" Trillo Nov 2013 #18
Not under a typical pension system. haele Nov 2013 #12
Legalize and tax the herb! zappaman Nov 2013 #5
"burdensome salary and pension costs" usually means Blue_Tires Nov 2013 #6
All of these pensions were doable... ReverendDeuce Nov 2013 #7
+1 Starry Messenger Nov 2013 #21
Pensions are dangerous for a long term company. A lot of risk. nt Logical Nov 2013 #8
You know in 50's and 60's just about every worker had upaloopa Nov 2013 #11
Nope, a CFO plans for pensions, just as they plan for facilities and depreciation. haele Nov 2013 #14
when a company goes bellyup onethatcares Nov 2013 #22
How about fucking raising taxes gopiscrap Nov 2013 #26
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Another U.S. city mulls b...»Reply #27