Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: How bad is the Intellectual Property Rights Chapter of the TPP? Beyond odious and beneath contempt [View all]Faryn Balyncd
(5,125 posts)12. Patent/copyright law ALREADY makes a mockery of constitutional intent, & deserves REPEAL.
Patents & copyrights have far exceeded constitutional intent, which is expressed in Article 1, Section 8, of the Constitution, without which patents & copyright have no constitutional basis.
Article 1, Section 8 states:
(The Congress shall have Power...)...
To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries.
An indication of what the framers thought reasonable for the "limited Times" can be seen by the Copyright Act of 1790, which granted copyright protection for 14 years.
But under the Sonny Bono Copyright Term Extension Act, bought & paid for by corporate lobbyists, copyright protection was EXTENDED RETROACTIVELY to 95 years after publication, and to 70 years after the death of the creator, or, for corporations, 120 years after creation.
The greatest mockery of the Constitution is that retroactively extending protection for works that were willingly created (and offered to the public under terms far more favorable to the public, and even retroactively extending protection for many more years for works acquired by non-creating corporate speculators under law which granted for lesser years of protection), does NOTHING "To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts", but only serves to give a windfall to the current owners of such works.
In practice, "intellectual property" law is perverse: granting protection to "Happy Birthday" to a non-creating corporation (Warner/Chappell Music) until 2030 for a song which evolved, dating to at least 1893, and published in the public domain as early as 1912.......... and also granting copyright protection to the current owners of "This Land Is Your Land", despite Woody Guthrie's explicit copyright notice
"This song is Copyrighted in U.S., under Seal of Copyright # 154085, for a period of 28 years, and anybody caught singin it without our permission, will be mighty good friends of ourn, cause we don't give a dern. Publish it. Write it. Sing it. Swing to it. Yodel it. We wrote it, that's all we wanted to do."
(and the fact that the copyright was not renewed by the then-owners in 1972.)
Intellectual property law has been perverted to the extent that it no longer serves "To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts", but only to enrich corporate interests, often non-creating corporate interests, and even interests whic have acquired those rights through fraud or the bribing of lawmakers. It certainly does not "promote the general welfare", or advance other goals of the framers.
We would be better off if all "intellectual property" law were repealed.
Pushing for even more draconian law, secretly, under the guise of a TPP "trade agreement" is a mockery of constitutional intent, and a betrayal.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
65 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
How bad is the Intellectual Property Rights Chapter of the TPP? Beyond odious and beneath contempt [View all]
cali
Nov 2013
OP
This just didn't start with the Obama administration although I am surprised that they would further
kelliekat44
Nov 2013
#17
This may have been the price our corporate overlords demanded for Obama winning the presidency
bklyncowgirl
Nov 2013
#33
Those who laughed at "New World Order conspiracy" theories, ought to re-think their position.
WinkyDink
Nov 2013
#10
No hope that this won't become a reality. The secrecy is, ironically, revealing.
WinkyDink
Nov 2013
#9
Patent/copyright law ALREADY makes a mockery of constitutional intent, & deserves REPEAL.
Faryn Balyncd
Nov 2013
#12
To our overlords, the Constitution really is just a antiquated piece of paper in a museum somewhere.
RC
Nov 2013
#16
It's criminal--corporate governments for the world, corporate 'rights' for regular people.
ancianita
Nov 2013
#20
No, the draft says patents to extend to books, artwork and mental processes
Generic Other
Nov 2013
#60
Being an heir of an author isn't some kind of accomplishment that deserves respect.
eridani
Nov 2013
#57
It can't right now. But the way things are going with the fascist string-pullers
boomersense
Nov 2013
#65