Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Faryn Balyncd

(5,125 posts)
12. Patent/copyright law ALREADY makes a mockery of constitutional intent, & deserves REPEAL.
Thu Nov 14, 2013, 07:38 AM
Nov 2013


Patents & copyrights have far exceeded constitutional intent, which is expressed in Article 1, Section 8, of the Constitution, without which patents & copyright have no constitutional basis.



Article 1, Section 8 states:

(The Congress shall have Power...)...
To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries.



An indication of what the framers thought reasonable for the "limited Times" can be seen by the Copyright Act of 1790, which granted copyright protection for 14 years.

But under the Sonny Bono Copyright Term Extension Act, bought & paid for by corporate lobbyists, copyright protection was EXTENDED RETROACTIVELY to 95 years after publication, and to 70 years after the death of the creator, or, for corporations, 120 years after creation.

The greatest mockery of the Constitution is that retroactively extending protection for works that were willingly created (and offered to the public under terms far more favorable to the public, and even retroactively extending protection for many more years for works acquired by non-creating corporate speculators under law which granted for lesser years of protection), does NOTHING "To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts", but only serves to give a windfall to the current owners of such works.




In practice, "intellectual property" law is perverse: granting protection to "Happy Birthday" to a non-creating corporation (Warner/Chappell Music) until 2030 for a song which evolved, dating to at least 1893, and published in the public domain as early as 1912.......... and also granting copyright protection to the current owners of "This Land Is Your Land", despite Woody Guthrie's explicit copyright notice

"This song is Copyrighted in U.S., under Seal of Copyright # 154085, for a period of 28 years, and anybody caught singin it without our permission, will be mighty good friends of ourn, cause we don't give a dern. Publish it. Write it. Sing it. Swing to it. Yodel it. We wrote it, that's all we wanted to do."

(and the fact that the copyright was not renewed by the then-owners in 1972.)




Intellectual property law has been perverted to the extent that it no longer serves "To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts", but only to enrich corporate interests, often non-creating corporate interests, and even interests whic have acquired those rights through fraud or the bribing of lawmakers. It certainly does not "promote the general welfare", or advance other goals of the framers.

We would be better off if all "intellectual property" law were repealed.

Pushing for even more draconian law, secretly, under the guise of a TPP "trade agreement" is a mockery of constitutional intent, and a betrayal.











Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Obama - The Corporatist That Never Stops Giving cantbeserious Nov 2013 #1
This is horrific billhicks76 Nov 2013 #15
This just didn't start with the Obama administration although I am surprised that they would further kelliekat44 Nov 2013 #17
It's absurd to think that the President doesn't know anything about the TPP cali Nov 2013 #21
He knows. 840high Nov 2013 #51
Well, the president is probably not familiar with legal documents and such jsr Nov 2013 #2
That's probably closer to the truth than you think n2doc Nov 2013 #6
It's why they coined the term "Plausible Deniability." WinkyDink Nov 2013 #13
Selling us down the river LuvNewcastle Nov 2013 #3
here we thought a republican president would sell us out madrchsod Nov 2013 #4
This may have been the price our corporate overlords demanded for Obama winning the presidency bklyncowgirl Nov 2013 #33
k&r for exposure. n/t Laelth Nov 2013 #5
How to give away citizen's rights to corporations in one easy step. fasttense Nov 2013 #7
Those who laughed at "New World Order conspiracy" theories, ought to re-think their position. WinkyDink Nov 2013 #10
and those here who throw hissy fits over any criticism of President Obama cali Nov 2013 #8
Yes, it really is intimidation. zeemike Nov 2013 #19
I'm sick of those chickenshit apologists cali Nov 2013 #22
Probably huddled together trying to find a way to get this post locked. zeemike Nov 2013 #24
oh the apologists and adorers really hate, hate hate cali Nov 2013 #25
wikileaks is bad, mmkay? cui bono Nov 2013 #38
The boxes in the garage. zeemike Nov 2013 #40
Which in this political climate with election issues is much worse than cui bono Nov 2013 #41
I have had poll dancers in my dreams. zeemike Nov 2013 #42
No hope that this won't become a reality. The secrecy is, ironically, revealing. WinkyDink Nov 2013 #9
I disagree. I think there is some hope cali Nov 2013 #11
Maybe it's because I just read the "Pharmaceuticals//TPP" thread. WinkyDink Nov 2013 #14
Patent/copyright law ALREADY makes a mockery of constitutional intent, & deserves REPEAL. Faryn Balyncd Nov 2013 #12
To our overlords, the Constitution really is just a antiquated piece of paper in a museum somewhere. RC Nov 2013 #16
A government can only get away with what the people allow it to do Pakid Nov 2013 #18
It's criminal--corporate governments for the world, corporate 'rights' for regular people. ancianita Nov 2013 #20
k/R ..... To me, this is THE most pressing issue -- killing this monstrosity. marmar Nov 2013 #23
I agree. cali Nov 2013 #26
Stronger intellectual property rights disproportionally benefit americans mathematic Nov 2013 #27
You are confusing "Americans" with "corporations" JackRiddler Nov 2013 #43
A copyright lawyer's notes on reading the TPP draft Generic Other Nov 2013 #28
This message was self-deleted by its author davidpdx Nov 2013 #59
k&r idwiyo Nov 2013 #29
Please consider putting a link to your TPP posts in the Progressive Group rhett o rick Nov 2013 #30
K&R Blue Owl Nov 2013 #31
rec Demo_Chris Nov 2013 #32
Wait a minute - you actually SUPPORT taking money away from jazzimov Nov 2013 #34
I encourage you to develop a deeper understanding of why so many countries cali Nov 2013 #45
you support this shit??? cali Nov 2013 #49
i call dibs on the patenting of weasels, Volaris Nov 2013 #54
Clever but progressoid Nov 2013 #56
No, the draft says patents to extend to books, artwork and mental processes Generic Other Nov 2013 #60
Being an heir of an author isn't some kind of accomplishment that deserves respect. eridani Nov 2013 #57
K & R !!! WillyT Nov 2013 #35
the first paragraph alone contains an issue treestar Nov 2013 #36
This is not something we can stop with calls to congresspeople or boomersense Nov 2013 #37
no, that's not true. there is considerable sentiment in the House against cali Nov 2013 #61
Fast Track, yes. I'm talking about any vehicle by which boomersense Nov 2013 #63
How would it pass without fast track? cali Nov 2013 #64
It can't right now. But the way things are going with the fascist string-pullers boomersense Nov 2013 #65
I am going to wait for more information Whisp Nov 2013 #39
Umm...leaked documents aren't "real"? Maedhros Nov 2013 #52
This thing must be killed, no compromises. JackRiddler Nov 2013 #44
can you believe the number of people coming out of the woodwork here and cali Nov 2013 #47
Seriously Generic Other Nov 2013 #62
Representative government, my ass. woo me with science Nov 2013 #46
oh, c'mon. the TTP is all about exporting soybeans! what ya got against soybeans? KG Nov 2013 #48
So much for these "New Democrats." They're all just Ex-Republicans. blkmusclmachine Nov 2013 #50
K&R ReRe Nov 2013 #53
K&R DeSwiss Nov 2013 #55
This is Goldman Sachs doing donheld Nov 2013 #58
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»How bad is the Intellectu...»Reply #12