Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Why did so many #GunBullies need assault weapons to protest a lunch mtg of 4 @MomsDemand members in [View all]EOTE
(13,409 posts)70. So again, there is nothing that would convince the nutter's feeble mind.
There is literally nothing that would convince you as you need your guns and you need to deny the horror of your ilk contributing to countless national tragedies, so you have your outcome already. You just need to convince your little mind that your outcome is the correct one. It doesn't matter how much evidence I provide, you're just going to say "Nuh uh!!! The NRA tells me that poll is bunk, I'm just too lazy and or dim to provide you with the link the NRA sent me in my email!" Christ gun nutters are some sick, ignorant folk.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
109 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Why did so many #GunBullies need assault weapons to protest a lunch mtg of 4 @MomsDemand members in [View all]
Playinghardball
Nov 2013
OP
2nd amendment is a whites only law and being a bully with a gun is 100% different from being a
uponit7771
Nov 2013
#8
Yeap, and slavery ended on day 1 of end of civil war... oh wait... :rolleyes: I like the abtuse...
uponit7771
Nov 2013
#19
very relevant, unenforced or unequally applied laws among racial lines applies here. You know dog on
uponit7771
Nov 2013
#28
that if black or Hispanics dressed in "urban" wear were to do the same they'd be left to do such in
uponit7771
Nov 2013
#49
What the!?!? Blacks shared in the protections of the BOR!?!?!?! WHERE? Blacks don't have full
uponit7771
Nov 2013
#104
lol "speculate" as if there isn't plenty of historical evidence?! I live in the US
uponit7771
Nov 2013
#107
Ok, I'll do that sounds like an interesting perspective but in this day and time it doesn't fit...
uponit7771
Nov 2013
#109
That large group of openly carrying gun owners was there to intimidate. Period.
riderinthestorm
Nov 2013
#9
No, but there is not a politician alive that wouldn't vote with 86% of the population
clffrdjk
Nov 2013
#42
So that's your argument, it has to be inaccurate because a vocal minority never gets what it wants?
EOTE
Nov 2013
#57
So again, your insanely dim-witted argument is that congress always does what the public wants.
EOTE
Nov 2013
#84
spin spin spin, but does he know the procedure to get out, I fear it is too late.
clffrdjk
Nov 2013
#94
Would love to see the jury results on this one, 2-4 voted to keep this troll post around nt
geek tragedy
Nov 2013
#37
I'm surprised that you didn't toss in a "yahoo" and a "yippee" here and there.
MrScorpio
Nov 2013
#46
Had 15 Hispanics or blacks meet with assault weapons to take a pic police would swarm that area
uponit7771
Nov 2013
#7
Because cowards need a blanky. They have no courage so a totem is their courage.
Lint Head
Nov 2013
#26