General Discussion

xmas74

(30,085 posts)

9. He was found not guilty by a "jury" of his peers

Thu Nov 14, 2013, 07:31 PM

Nov 2013

In this case, all captains and all pilots, with a couple of them being B-2 pilots. Whiteman is a small base, the pilot pool is small and they all know each other. B-2 pilots? They're the cream of the crop.

In other words, they all knew each other. It was a forgone conclusion that he would be found not guilty. Thing is, the rape didn't happen on base. The Air Force demanded it be taken out of the court system and be "handled" by them.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

51 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Facts About Rape Committed By An Air Force Pilot [View all] xmas74 Nov 2013 OP

Horrific hypocrisy. nt Mnemosyne Nov 2013 #1

We need to get the word out about this case. xmas74 Nov 2013 #2

Another rape left unpunished gollygee Nov 2013 #3

In this case, the victim is a young professional woman xmas74 Nov 2013 #4

It says at the link that he was found not guilty. delta17 Nov 2013 #7

Him being found not guilty because he claimed a sleeping woman gollygee Nov 2013 #8

And it was taken out of the courts xmas74 Nov 2013 #11

I thought it was just all officers. delta17 Nov 2013 #17

There are things left out of the blog xmas74 Nov 2013 #19

I left in 2007, so it's been a while. delta17 Nov 2013 #20

I was in JoCo in 2007. xmas74 Nov 2013 #21

He was found not guilty by a "jury" of his peers xmas74 Nov 2013 #9

Once again, rape is just barely illegal gollygee Nov 2013 #18

Apparently, she should have "just closed her legs." Butterbean Nov 2013 #5

I'm sure she could have fought off a B-2 pilot. xmas74 Nov 2013 #6

OMFG. Because drunk women sleeping in a guest room saying no = leading him on. Butterbean Nov 2013 #10

He won't be convicted. xmas74 Nov 2013 #12

Yes, I saw that. Is there ANY hope of him being tried in civilian court if he's not active duty? Butterbean Nov 2013 #13

Nope xmas74 Nov 2013 #14

Pardon me while I think ugly things I can't post here. n/t Butterbean Nov 2013 #15

Now you see why this needs shared everywhere. xmas74 Nov 2013 #16

In theory NobodyHere Nov 2013 #22

Don't think so. mn9driver Nov 2013 #27

I'm not sure how the Watada case applies to this. NobodyHere Nov 2013 #51

I found this posted on another forum xmas74 Nov 2013 #23

As I posted on your other thread... NaturalHigh Nov 2013 #24

And as I posted back in that thread xmas74 Nov 2013 #25

Was a false allegation of rape fair? NaturalHigh Nov 2013 #26

Is it fair that the stalking started with her before the trial? xmas74 Nov 2013 #28

"She will be losing hers shortly-it's a done deal." NaturalHigh Nov 2013 #29

She's been informed that her job is toast. xmas74 Nov 2013 #30

No, I was not referring to the KC Star article. NaturalHigh Nov 2013 #31

Except for the fact that local pd has been contacted xmas74 Nov 2013 #32

Fair enough. NaturalHigh Nov 2013 #33

How is that cyber-stalking? historylovr Nov 2013 #39

An acquittal does not mean a false accusation BainsBane Nov 2013 #46

Exactly. historylovr Nov 2013 #47

Kick historylovr Nov 2013 #34

There is another thread about this too xmas74 Nov 2013 #35

Done historylovr Nov 2013 #36

it was a DUer who accused the parties of cyber-stalking, xmas74 Nov 2013 #37

Oh, yeah, I got that. :) historylovr Nov 2013 #38

That person seems to have a vested interest in the military xmas74 Nov 2013 #40

That is curious. historylovr Nov 2013 #41

And it makes no sense. xmas74 Nov 2013 #42

Like I said earlier, fair enough. NaturalHigh Nov 2013 #43

What made me curious was that you said you were familiar with Whiteman. xmas74 Nov 2013 #44

Okay. NaturalHigh Nov 2013 #45

Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2013 #48

How do you know him? xmas74 Nov 2013 #49

That attorney needs a lesson in blogging 101 Paolo123 Nov 2013 #50