Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Joey Liberal

(5,526 posts)

10. Here's how

Reply to TwilightGardener (Reply #1)

Thu Nov 14, 2013, 06:38 PM

Nov 2013

No co-pays for anything up to 4K. Everything else is now on me. Including meds. Also higher premiums. The reason given by my employer? "The ACA only requires them to provide the minimum essential coverage".

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

10 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

What the ACA ignores [View all] Joey Liberal Nov 2013 OP

You have employer coverage? How did it change? TwilightGardener Nov 2013 #1

Here's how Joey Liberal Nov 2013 #10

ACA is a Rube Goldberg machine ErikJ Nov 2013 #2

and it never stood a chance of passing so why pretend otherwise? cali Nov 2013 #3

and would have had 0% chance of passing. cbdo2007 Nov 2013 #4

That is sadly the truth. ACA HAS been working well in Mass for 6 yrs though so ...... ErikJ Nov 2013 #6

+1 to question to you upthread: "How did your coverage change?" closeupready Nov 2013 #5

You don't have to stay with your employers plan Lifelong Dem Nov 2013 #7

I doubt it will be cheaper Travis_0004 Nov 2013 #8

If the insurance is "expensive insurance" like the OP said Lifelong Dem Nov 2013 #9