Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: I voted for marijuana legalization in Oregon the last round. [View all]HuckleB
(35,773 posts)38. Bullshit.
You are pushing bad science. If you have to go to youtube to justify you're stand, you're just done.
Come on, I'm not new here.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
47 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
You have no idea what you are talking about. Do you know any patients personally?
liberal_at_heart
Nov 2013
#3
patients have been decades ahead of the research and the only reason we don't have research here in
liberal_at_heart
Nov 2013
#5
Respectfully, there has been research, and there is a patent on Cannabis treatment for Glaucoma
solarhydrocan
Nov 2013
#45
After you watch the video, especially the parts about the kid's seizures, then we can talk
Tx4obama
Nov 2013
#12
Oh, you mean sick people? Is that who you mean? Sick people can't let this go?
liberal_at_heart
Nov 2013
#16
Spend some time wathcing the video in Comment #6. MANY MILLIONS of foilks have watched it on TV...
Tx4obama
Nov 2013
#26
Bringing up 'YouTube' is ridiculous. Just because a 'copy' of the 'documentary' is on 'YouTube'
Tx4obama
Nov 2013
#35
Since you don't have a cable TV perhaps you should try watching DOCUMENTARIES online
Tx4obama
Nov 2013
#43
Seeing as cannabis is schedule 1 it's not actually allowed to be looked at by "science folks".
Jesus Malverde
Nov 2013
#23
That might have been legitimate ten years ago, but it's no longer the way to go.
HuckleB
Nov 2013
#37