Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: I voted for marijuana legalization in Oregon the last round. [View all]Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)44. HuckleB, you're playing bull-in-the-ring. Good football drill...
but the attitude doesn't engender much constructive dialog. And there is so much attitude on DU, now.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
47 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
You have no idea what you are talking about. Do you know any patients personally?
liberal_at_heart
Nov 2013
#3
patients have been decades ahead of the research and the only reason we don't have research here in
liberal_at_heart
Nov 2013
#5
Respectfully, there has been research, and there is a patent on Cannabis treatment for Glaucoma
solarhydrocan
Nov 2013
#45
After you watch the video, especially the parts about the kid's seizures, then we can talk
Tx4obama
Nov 2013
#12
Oh, you mean sick people? Is that who you mean? Sick people can't let this go?
liberal_at_heart
Nov 2013
#16
Spend some time wathcing the video in Comment #6. MANY MILLIONS of foilks have watched it on TV...
Tx4obama
Nov 2013
#26
Bringing up 'YouTube' is ridiculous. Just because a 'copy' of the 'documentary' is on 'YouTube'
Tx4obama
Nov 2013
#35
Since you don't have a cable TV perhaps you should try watching DOCUMENTARIES online
Tx4obama
Nov 2013
#43
Seeing as cannabis is schedule 1 it's not actually allowed to be looked at by "science folks".
Jesus Malverde
Nov 2013
#23
That might have been legitimate ten years ago, but it's no longer the way to go.
HuckleB
Nov 2013
#37