Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: When Parents Yank Their Kids Out of Standardized Tests [View all]jsr
(7,712 posts)63. For-profit standardized testing industry can't be trusted
http://www.tampabay.com/opinion/columns/article1230845.ece
For-profit standardized testing industry can't be trusted
By Todd Farley, Special to the Times
In Print: Sunday, May 20, 2012
The scores for the writing portion of this year's FCAT plummeted so precipitously that the abilities of Florida's student writers aren't even being called into question. The validity of the scoring statistics are. While I don't want to say "I told you so" regarding the dubiousness of those statistics, I did tell you so, as my 2009 book highlighted in detail all the ways the numbers produced by the for-profit standardized testing industry cannot be trusted.
Take the stats produced at Pearson scoring centers around the country, where I worked for the better part of 15 years. On the first project I worked scoring student essays, I had to pass a qualifying exam to stay on the job. When I failed that qualifying exam (twice), I was unceremoniously fired. So were half the original hundred scorers who had also failed the tests. Of course, when Pearson realized the next morning they no longer had enough scorers to complete the project on time, they simply lowered the "passing" grade on the qualifying test and put us flunkies right back on the job.
Yes, those of us considered unable to score student essays 12 hours before were welcomed back into the scoring center with open arms, deemed qualified after all.
Such duplicity was not an aberration in my experience either. For a decade and a half I saw every sort of corporate chicanery and statistical tomfoolery. The test-scoring industry seemed focused on getting deadlines met, projects completed and scores put on tests, but only then did any thought seem to be given to meaningful scores being put on them.

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/28/opinion/28farley.html
For-profit standardized testing industry can't be trusted
By Todd Farley, Special to the Times
In Print: Sunday, May 20, 2012
The scores for the writing portion of this year's FCAT plummeted so precipitously that the abilities of Florida's student writers aren't even being called into question. The validity of the scoring statistics are. While I don't want to say "I told you so" regarding the dubiousness of those statistics, I did tell you so, as my 2009 book highlighted in detail all the ways the numbers produced by the for-profit standardized testing industry cannot be trusted.
Take the stats produced at Pearson scoring centers around the country, where I worked for the better part of 15 years. On the first project I worked scoring student essays, I had to pass a qualifying exam to stay on the job. When I failed that qualifying exam (twice), I was unceremoniously fired. So were half the original hundred scorers who had also failed the tests. Of course, when Pearson realized the next morning they no longer had enough scorers to complete the project on time, they simply lowered the "passing" grade on the qualifying test and put us flunkies right back on the job.
Yes, those of us considered unable to score student essays 12 hours before were welcomed back into the scoring center with open arms, deemed qualified after all.
Such duplicity was not an aberration in my experience either. For a decade and a half I saw every sort of corporate chicanery and statistical tomfoolery. The test-scoring industry seemed focused on getting deadlines met, projects completed and scores put on tests, but only then did any thought seem to be given to meaningful scores being put on them.

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/28/opinion/28farley.html
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
64 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Yes, I've always liked old things, old tools, old books, old pictures, old people.
bemildred
Nov 2013
#17
+1. The testing days are a small part of the time wasted on this empy endeavor.
winter is coming
Nov 2013
#9
Can someone tell me what "teaching to the test" actually is? As opposed to teaching?
AlbertCat
Nov 2013
#19
The vast majority of learning problems for a kid are out of the teacher's control. n/t
ieoeja
Nov 2013
#42
Before slinging insults, try debate. As an ignorant outsider I should be easy to defeat....
Demo_Chris
Nov 2013
#57
Instead of teaching them something new, first they do worksheets to prepare for the practice
winter is coming
Nov 2013
#55
The teachers have always been measured, it was just done indirectly before.
LuvNewcastle
Nov 2013
#29
Common Core Assessment Myths and Realities: Moratorium Needed From More Tests, Costs, Stress
xchrom
Nov 2013
#41
Taking it out of the hands of the educators is the stupidest thing you can do
MattBaggins
Nov 2013
#52
I was so excited when they did this. It is great to see parents, teachers, and students stand
liberal_at_heart
Nov 2013
#46