General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: This message was self-deleted by its author [View all]sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)I love these kinds of 'discussions' btw, unlike so many others.
'Slapping a dehumanizing label on someone THEN proceeding to talk about them as if they were not human, unable to read what is being said about them' and additionally, unable to respond in defense of themselves.
Nothing about not using the word to make a point. No gotcha moment, sorry.
I am for a rule that once someone is banned, that is the end of any discussion about them. We used to have that rule on Progressive forums and it was a good one.
Not having it leads those who become subjects of 'grave-dancing' to go somewhere else, and it's a big internet, to defend themselves as happened here. Had there been no further discussion of this or any other banning, the person who is the subject of grave-dancing threads would not feel the need to respond in such a way.
You did copy and paste my words and then interpreted them WRONGLY as it turned out. All I did was correct your error.