Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

JohnyCanuck

(9,922 posts)
3. If 3 spent fuel assemblies at reactor #4 being damaged was bad news...
Sun Nov 17, 2013, 09:06 PM
Nov 2013

because the damaged assemblies significantly increases the risk of another catastrophe occurring when removing the spent reactor #4 fuel from the "temporary" storage pool (perched 100ft in the air) to a safer and more secure location - How does a total of 80 damaged spent fuel assemblies across the entire plant complex sound?

#Fukushima I Nuke Plant: TEPCO Admits Total 80 Spent Fuel Assemblies Had Damages Before the Nuclear Accident, 70 of Them in Reactor 1 Spent Fuel Pool

According to Kahoku Shinpo, a Fukushima local paper, TEPCO admitted on November 15, 2013 that there are 70 fuel assemblies with damaged fuel rods in the Reactor 1 Spent Fuel Pool, located on the operating floor (top floor) of the reactor building whose air radiation levels are measured in millisievert/hour and sievert/hour (first floor).

There are also three such fuel assemblies in the Reactor 2 SFP, and four of them in the Reactor 3 SFP.

Total 80 spent fuel assemblies in the SFPs in Reactors 1 - 4 are damaged.

The damages had been there long before the March 11, 2011 accident, and TEPCO claims it properly notified the national government as they discovered the damages. But the company has come clean in public only now.

Kahoku Shinpo article below suggests that the oldest of such damaged fuels may have been there for 40 years in the Reactor 1 Spent Fuel Pool. (Reactor 1 started generating electricity in 1971.)

http://ex-skf.blogspot.com/2013/11/fukushima-i-nuke-plant-tepco-admits.html

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Japan Atomic Energy Commi...»Reply #3