Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Arne Duncan: ‘White suburban moms’ upset that Common Core shows their kids aren’t ‘brilliant’ [View all]greatlaurel
(2,020 posts)57. Well said!
It is time to look to Finland's system. It does not enrich the corporations but educates all children regardless of their economic class. We can do this here. I hope you are right about the awakening of the suburban folks.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
130 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Arne Duncan: ‘White suburban moms’ upset that Common Core shows their kids aren’t ‘brilliant’ [View all]
boston bean
Nov 2013
OP
You cannot teach children anything with a system that is based on constant testing.
sabrina 1
Nov 2013
#51
Yes, I did mean Standardized testing. And I also despise the pressure to pass students before they
sabrina 1
Nov 2013
#62
And what Arne is proposing is what has been tried in those other countries, right?
joeybee12
Nov 2013
#110
Dear Duncpig, education of our children is not a competition like your anti gay Olympics in Sochi
Bluenorthwest
Nov 2013
#5
How is the Obama's choice to educate their children at a religious instiution 'tacky?'
msanthrope
Nov 2013
#13
What action? That the President has the right to send his kids to a religious school?
msanthrope
Nov 2013
#39
As the parent of a child in a Friend's School, I often encounter the 'Quakerism isn't a 'real'
msanthrope
Nov 2013
#45
Chelsea Clinton went there and Biden's grandkids- but Bush? I do not thhink so
lunasun
Nov 2013
#127
I went to schools like Sidwell, which is why I can read. I did not say the school is tacky I said
Bluenorthwest
Nov 2013
#21
Really? You went to a Friend's school? And you dare criticize others who send their kids? nt
msanthrope
Nov 2013
#35
You want a religious education for all American children, complete with missonary work?
msanthrope
Nov 2013
#61
You are opposed to the Sidwell standards of education for everyone except the children of the 1%
sabrina 1
Nov 2013
#73
You don't want the standards available to the 1% to be available to everyone else?
sabrina 1
Nov 2013
#78
Not religious ones. That's a parent's choice, not to be forced by government. nt
msanthrope
Nov 2013
#80
It's clear that you oppose the same educational standards available for the wealthy for the masses.
sabrina 1
Nov 2013
#96
Why are you struggling so hard to keep Sidwell Educational Standards from the general public?
sabrina 1
Nov 2013
#106
Thank you Sabrina, for asking what the President's real religion is. I think it revealing. nt
msanthrope
Nov 2013
#107
I don't answer your questions, Sabrina. You know that. But thanks for asking what the President's
msanthrope
Nov 2013
#123
Sure you do, each time you try so hard to distract from the questions, you answer them
sabrina 1
Nov 2013
#124
their kids learn to think and create, our kids learn to obey and fill in bubbles on tests
yurbud
Nov 2013
#102
How dare the Obamas not use their children as political pawns! Some posters obviously
msanthrope
Nov 2013
#81
because they are pushing policies on public schools to do things their kids school wouldn't
yurbud
Nov 2013
#101
what is it that makes that public school different from Sidwell Friends and less safe?
yurbud
Nov 2013
#108
Why would you expect taxpayers who are sending their children to the public school to
msanthrope
Nov 2013
#111
I suspect it's also because those schools aren't as safe because of overcrowding and under-staffing,
yurbud
Nov 2013
#115
by your definition, any kid that attends public schools being "reformed" by Arne Duncan
yurbud
Nov 2013
#114
I think you misunderstood my definition. But kindly name a child you think is a pawn. nt
msanthrope
Nov 2013
#116
Do you think the Obamas would WANTredundant standardized testing and a much narrower curriculum
yurbud
Nov 2013
#117
The worst cabinet appointment EVER by ANY president. Duncan is a moron, and I am
duffyduff
Nov 2013
#71
I oppose the testing side of Common Core. I think we need to be sure all kids are given a fair
Mass
Nov 2013
#16
While I agree that American schools are structurally racist I disagree that reform is a fix
kmlisle
Nov 2013
#42
I wish she was thinking that, but is there evidence she'll dump "profits before people" approach?
yurbud
Nov 2013
#49
I think there's some amount of truth in his comments, but it's not the biggest reason for opposition
Renew Deal
Nov 2013
#41
He's the kind of guy who would have been pulling gold fillings at the concentration camps
yurbud
Nov 2013
#69
I have complained about Arne from Day 1...and took quite a bit of heat from it.
onpatrol98
Nov 2013
#59
The problem in the Arne Duncan / Obama system of making schools compete for resources is that the
Erose999
Nov 2013
#75
I could see that being true. Coming from Duncan though it's like a cannibal telling you eat...
yurbud
Nov 2013
#100