General Discussion

woo me with science

(32,139 posts)

32. +100000 We need fully vetted candidates. We need a vigorous national debate on ISSUES.

Mon Nov 18, 2013, 03:07 PM

Nov 2013

And we need to DEMAND that candidates are clear about where they stand on EVERY SINGLE IMPORTANT ISSUE. No more of THIS type of garbage we saw during the last election:

Obama campaign REFUSES to disclose plans on Social Security, says discussion belongs with senators
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10021483594

]

The DLC/Third Way worked hard last election to spread a DISGUSTING meme that the people should shut up during election season so as not to disturb the delicate plans of the candidates. This sort of garbage cannot be accepted. Election season is the time for every citizen to participate STRONGLY and VOCALLY, so that we are clear about what kind of candidates we want, and what kind of policies those candidates promise to work for, for us.

It's time for this destructive meme about shutting up during elections to stop. http://www.democraticunderground.com/10021488072

Now is the time to fire the country up for 2014 AND 2016. Now is the time to be finding and PROMOTING candidates who actually represent the people rather than corporations.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

48 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

You're doing it again, DU.... [View all] ChisolmTrailDem Nov 2013 OP

Yes, it's stupid and annoying, but The Velveteen Ocelot Nov 2013 #1

^^^This!^^^ BlueCaliDem Nov 2013 #7

Can we at least wait until there are actual candidates BainsBane Nov 2013 #36

I know this may be hard to grasp but here it is: Le Taz Hot Nov 2013 #2

For the most part that's true, wickerwoman Nov 2013 #19

Looks like FUD to me, a lot of HRC downers are giving moving goal post litmus's for her. I dont see uponit7771 Nov 2013 #3

Hillary is being shoved down our throats again as inevitable cali Nov 2013 #4

The point of the OP is that trashing a candidate isn't a good response bhikkhu Nov 2013 #9

Who is shoving Hillary down your throat? Cali_Democrat Nov 2013 #17

C'mon. Start with Schumer cali Nov 2013 #22

ya. i am not playing. i hear ya. nt seabeyond Nov 2013 #5

Yup. We're doing that. n/t Chan790 Nov 2013 #6

sorta funny how politics works hfojvt Nov 2013 #8

Candidates become viable through momentum and recognition. woo me with science Nov 2013 #10

That may be so - but the trial run for that strategy is 2014 el_bryanto Nov 2013 #14

Nonsense. We can do both. nt woo me with science Nov 2013 #20

Can we do both without fighting internally at DU? el_bryanto Nov 2013 #23

Why on earth would you "fight" anyone trying to promote progressive candidates at DU? woo me with science Nov 2013 #31

I'm not particularly upset about anything actually el_bryanto Nov 2013 #37

Please define "friction," woo me with science Nov 2013 #38

The simplest description of what I consider malignant friction el_bryanto Nov 2013 #42

How on earth did you get from, woo me with science Nov 2013 #46

How do you anticipate supporters of more centrist candidates to respond to el_bryanto Nov 2013 #47

actually it is possible to do both at the same time - deal w/2014 & promote a 2016 candidate nt msongs Nov 2013 #11

What's really annoying is that everybody is ignoring the obvious candidate - me! el_bryanto Nov 2013 #12

"Trashing" one candidate is not the same as "supporting" the alternative candidate. JoePhilly Nov 2013 #13

See ya! polichick Nov 2013 #15

Well I haven't backed a potential candidate yet Cali_Democrat Nov 2013 #16

Show me the threads trashing Warren or any other candidate. Nine Nov 2013 #18

lol, that would be an interesting rule quinnox Nov 2013 #28

+1 And it's not just the election... SomethingFishy Nov 2013 #21

Exactly, we all must be united around one candidate now quinnox Nov 2013 #24

The Hillary-haters are getting a bit tedious. Nye Bevan Nov 2013 #25

Meanwhile, zero people have announced their candidacy. JaneyVee Nov 2013 #26

Agreed. We need to be concentrating on 2014 not tearing each other apart over who the nominee will OregonBlue Nov 2013 #27

With the TPP leak, there's no better time to hammer Hillary for her complicity in the matter. NuclearDem Nov 2013 #29

+100000 We need fully vetted candidates. We need a vigorous national debate on ISSUES. woo me with science Nov 2013 #32

I recall that we did pretty well in 2006... brooklynite Nov 2013 #30

Keyword there is "maybe". I believe we should be concentrating on 2014 so that ChisolmTrailDem Nov 2013 #35

I don't hate Hillary Aerows Nov 2013 #33

It's inevitable. Just shine it on until after the 2014 elections. MineralMan Nov 2013 #34

Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2013 #39

I agree. I support Hillary but I like Warren as well and would be happy to support her in the hrmjustin Nov 2013 #40

I like all Democrats. Kingofalldems Nov 2013 #41

Tsk. Tsk. People talking politics on a political discussion board. Tierra_y_Libertad Nov 2013 #43

The vapors! LOL! n/t ChisolmTrailDem Nov 2013 #48

Why was there so little acrimony between supporters of Edward, Biden and Obama? ieoeja Nov 2013 #44

Most of the debate I have seen isn't really about Hillary vs <whoever>. bvar22 Nov 2013 #45