Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: You're doing it again, DU.... [View all]woo me with science
(32,139 posts)46. How on earth did you get from,
Or - to put it another way - should people who want Hillary Clinton or Bernie Saunders (sic...It's spelled "Sanders"to be our next presidential candidate continue to post or will that create hard feelings that distract from our over arching goals?
to
Can you disagree with someone without thinking they are a bastard? History shows that we have a problem with that on occasion.
To even suggest that supporters of Clinton or Sanders should not "continue to post" is perhaps the most absurd suggestion I have ever seen on a political discussion board. It goes against everything our democratic political process, not to mention *a discussion board,* is supposed to be about.
To then attempt to justify it by arguing that some DUers might be "thinking" nasty things about other DUers is the icing on the absurdity cake.
Can you disagree with someone without thinking they are a bastard? History shows that we have a problem with that on occasion.
"We" have a problem with that? I would gently suggest that you speak for yourself, and perhaps avoid DU if it is causing thoughts or feelings you find uncomfortable. You are entitled to your feelings, because people's *feelings* are their own business. What people *write* at DU, however, we have juries to moderate. I expect that posts calling others here "bastards" will be quickly juried and removed, don't you?
I *expect* to see blatantly dishonest statements called out, and I am grateful when that occurs. The best antidote to dishonesty is sunshine, just as the best antidote to malignant policies and politicians beholden to corporate money is awakening the public to the fact that other, better policies and politicians are possible.
It's time for this destructive meme about shutting up during elections to stop. http://www.democraticunderground.com/10021488072
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
48 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Looks like FUD to me, a lot of HRC downers are giving moving goal post litmus's for her. I dont see
uponit7771
Nov 2013
#3
Why on earth would you "fight" anyone trying to promote progressive candidates at DU?
woo me with science
Nov 2013
#31
actually it is possible to do both at the same time - deal w/2014 & promote a 2016 candidate nt
msongs
Nov 2013
#11
What's really annoying is that everybody is ignoring the obvious candidate - me!
el_bryanto
Nov 2013
#12
"Trashing" one candidate is not the same as "supporting" the alternative candidate.
JoePhilly
Nov 2013
#13
Agreed. We need to be concentrating on 2014 not tearing each other apart over who the nominee will
OregonBlue
Nov 2013
#27
With the TPP leak, there's no better time to hammer Hillary for her complicity in the matter.
NuclearDem
Nov 2013
#29
+100000 We need fully vetted candidates. We need a vigorous national debate on ISSUES.
woo me with science
Nov 2013
#32
Keyword there is "maybe". I believe we should be concentrating on 2014 so that
ChisolmTrailDem
Nov 2013
#35