‘Rape porn’ possession to be punished by three years in jail, David Cameron to announce

[Gravitycollapse]

298. No, the absurdity is inherent in the conflation of rape pornography, which justifies sexual violence

and gay sex, which does nothing of the sort. To argue that both are equally ambivalent is to be absolutely foolishly shortsighted.

This is not me discussing the legality of either but instead challenging the ridiculous assertion that any sexual practice is automatically equitable to any other. Even sexual practices that depict and help justify sexual violence. That's a stupid thing to say.

Again, I say, if you want to respond with a vague diatribe on "freedom," make sure you're responding to the right argument. Otherwise it comes off as if you didn't even bother to read what I wrote.

Legality or illegality is not the same as moral and immoral. Not in the slightest. There are all sorts of legal actions one can take that provides for substantive harm against one's self or someone else.