General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: ‘Rape porn’ possession to be punished by three years in jail, David Cameron to announce [View all]BainsBane
(57,775 posts)You go from one false statement to another.
It's a police state if the laws seeks to eradicate violence against women because in a free society men should be able to treat women as disposable objects of violent rage. Your definition of freedom already reigns in this country, which is why only 4% of rapists ever see jail time, and when they do terms can be as short as thirty days. The UK seeks to do something about in furtherance of a society not predicated entirely on misogyny. The horror.
Pedophiles, whether active or latent, watch child porn. I think the same principal applies to rape porn. So if rapists are denied visual depiction of their violent desires in order to combat violence in society, that's a net positive. I find a definition of freedom predicated on violence against women to be repulsive.