Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)

3. Or another (fact-based) way to look at it …

Reply to grahamhgreen (Original post)

Mon Nov 18, 2013, 10:13 PM

Nov 2013

Americans will be forced to buy for-profit insurance (or pay a really modest tax penalty), but will have a choice to buy plans that will actually cover little or nothing or an ACA-qualifying plans.

And you have a problem with this?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

7 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Let me get this straight, if we follow the Presidents latest HCR plan, [View all] grahamhgreen Nov 2013 OP

Well how can he get a break? upaloopa Nov 2013 #1

Well, he failed to close gitmo, does that make him a liar? grahamhgreen Nov 2013 #2

I think ... 1StrongBlackMan Nov 2013 #4

Um, he also promised us a public option! We don't want him lying about that too:) but grahamhgreen Nov 2013 #6

Or another (fact-based) way to look at it … 1StrongBlackMan Nov 2013 #3

Or maybe the "junk insurance" is just a talking point. A dramtocally failed talking point. Nuclear Unicorn Nov 2013 #5

The examples I've seen are junk - coverage at $800/year with a $2,000 max payout. Consumer grahamhgreen Nov 2013 #7