‘Rape porn’ possession to be punished by three years in jail, David Cameron to announce

[BainsBane]

539. bullshit

Last edited Tue Nov 19, 2013, 02:32 AM - Edit history (1)

You have a lot of nerve. You pose an outlandish strawman question and act outraged when you get one in turn.

Your assertion that it has nothing to do with rape reveals your complete ignorance of the subject matter, most notably the fact that scholars have established a causal link being violent porn and the tendency toward committing violence. If you actually were concerned about violence against women you'd bother to inform yourself minimally on the subject, including that some of that porn is actual rape, the kind you absurdly claim is entirely irrelevant to rape porn.

Cry to someone else about the poor British rapists who won't be able to see their handiwork memorialized. Their groupies will just have to find something else to look at for a change. Hell will freeze over before I shed a tear for rapists, rape fantasists, or their apologists.

I'll be telling the prisoners in Gitmo not to worry about habeus because the real travesty is that British rapists and rape fantasists can no longer view illegally produced porn.

So you pretend you have the moral high road and to a thread of rape survivors who actually care about their own safety, while you lecture us that our concerns are frivolous because what really counts is unfettered access to depictions of violence against women. So a few enslaved women are raped and beaten in the process. What counts is men's liberty to consume any vile, abusive media produced, even when it is produced illegally (which is what the law actually bans).