General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: ‘Rape porn’ possession to be punished by three years in jail, David Cameron to announce [View all]BainsBane
(57,707 posts)I have continually pointed out the distinction between consensual and nonconsensual porn, while it's defenders want to pretend no such thing as non-consensual porn exists.
My position has been clear. As you noted, I have many, many posts in this thread--far too many. If you can't get my position from them, it's because you don't want to.
Yeah, the conversation devolved into bullshit about banning Game of Thrones and the Accused as a means of detracting from the point--some members insistence that their access to any and all kinds of porn trumps the rights of women to be free from violence and human trafficking.
Your pretense that there is something gender neutral about rape porn is laughable. Either you have no idea what you're talking about or you're misrepresenting the facts. If you consume rape porn, you know what it is. If you don't, Google it with the safe search filter off. There is nothing close to gender parity (your ridiculous references to "men and women" alike) in victims or consumers of that porn. If an entire industry was built around the violation of men, that shit would have never been legal.