During the Zimmerman trial, we have had DUers argue for his acquittal, which, of course, happened... [View all]

[MrScorpio]

Some argued that his acquittal was going to happen because the prosecution was bungling the case, or that the Florida laws were tilted towards Zimmerman's way, or even that the justice system in that part of Central Florida itself was never going to field a jury that would convict some non-black person of killing any black person.

Now, if those arguments were tempered with a caveat that he SHOULD have been convicted of killing an innocent kid, I wouldn't have had any qualms with that line of argument at all.

But we have had people state that he should have been acquitted because they believed him to be not guilty of the charges. In that Travon Martin did something that warranted his own killing.

It's those people that I ask now; Do you still think that George Zimmerman deserved to be acquitted in the shooting death of Travon Martin?

Even today?