General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: ‘Rape porn’ possession to be punished by three years in jail, David Cameron to announce [View all]EOTE
(13,409 posts)Far too much of that utterly nonsensical tripe. You believe that consensual rape-porn doesn't exist because rape, by definition, is non-consensual. I'm sorry, but you'll find the typical person finds crap like that far too stupid to respond to. You see, we're discussing a film/video PORTRAYAL of a non-consensual act that is in itself consensual. Understand? I know it's a difficult concept to understand, but things get confusing when looking at video/film on a screen. You see, those actors you see on television shooting at each other? When they start bleeding and give their final words, they're not ACTUALLY dying, they're just playing pretend. So, by you claiming that consensual rape porn cannot exist, you are telling the rest of the world that you are incapable of understanding things and as such, they can't be bothered to attempt to have a constructive conversation with you. You should be thankful to the ones who are actually taking the time to attempt to explain things to you. Most people wouldn't take the time and would simply respond with an "Awww, isn't that cute!"